On 2014-09-04 19:47, Shawn H Corey wrote:
> I have just added an article to my blog on my programming language
> about the GNU AutoTools. Please feel free to comment.
>
> http://kori-programming-language.blogspot.ca/2014/09/a-closer-look-at-gnu-autotools.html
> [1]
Well in my humble opinion
On Fri, 05 Sep 2014, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> * the good old "Goats Book" which is also available online, and seems
> to have received an update lately:
>
> https://www.sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_toc.html
>
> I still refer to my paper copy every once in a while, but by n
For further reference: don't forget Alexandre Duret-Lutz's excellent
Autotools Tutorial (https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~adl/autotools.html).
IMHO people should start with this, then the Autotools Mythbuster.
Regards
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 05
Another tutorial you might find useful is here:
http://www.dwheeler.com/autotools/
It is only an introduction, but I think it helps people get started.
I think the goat book is too old to be useful as a tutorial.
--- David A.Wheeler
___
Autoconf mailin
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:52:58 -0700
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I expect them to make constructive and specific suggestions, which
> have been in short supply in this thread but which have occurred in
> the past and, I hope, the future.
>
I have made suggestions; they've been ignored.
> It's not like
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 05 Sep 2014, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
>> * the good old "Goats Book" which is also available online, and seems
>> to have received an update lately:
>>
>>https://www.sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_
On 2014-09-04 20:02 -0400, Shawn H Corey wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:40:40 -0600
> "John Calcote" wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: autoconf-bounces+john.calcote=gmail@gnu.org
> > > [mailto:autoconf-bounces+john.calcote=gmail@gnu.org] On Behalf
> > > Of Shawn H Corey
>
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> Quoted from the linked page:
>> After some investigation, I discovered that the documentation for GNU
>> AutoTools was crappy. This is surprising considering how long it has
>> been in use. ☹
>
> Can you be more constructive? I think Autoconf a
