I have a configure.ac as attached. If I run autoreconf -fi on this file it
stops with 'configure.ac:23: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DEFINE'
but at least I see no error in that line. But if I remove the following
block beginning with 'AC_ARG_WITH([resolve-neigh],' everything runs without
pro
On 03/31/2014 12:48 PM, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> I have a configure.ac as attached. If I run autoreconf -fi on this file it
> stops with 'configure.ac:23: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DEFINE'
> but at least I see no error in that line. But if I remove the following
> block beginning with 'AC_
On 03/31/2014 12:55 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/31/2014 12:48 PM, Philipp Thomas wrote:
>> I have a configure.ac as attached. If I run autoreconf -fi on this file it
>> stops with 'configure.ac:23: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DEFINE'
>> but at least I see no error in that line. But if I r
Hi --
Does anyone have any idea as to how one could write an Autoconf test to
check whether long long (or int64_t, or whatever) is implemented natively,
and so is likely to be fast, as opposed to being emulated by the compiler as
a pair of 32-bit values?
(SIZEOF_LONG == 8 || SIZEOF_VOID_P == 8) w