On Tuesday 21 May 2013 09:57:32 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 2013-05-21 07:33, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> Works for me. But we [distros] do want to mandate autoreconf anyway in
> >> the general case: it is the *only* way to keep upstream honest about
> >> the much hated build system not bitro
On Monday 20 May 2013 10:37:00 Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/18/2013 05:45 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 16:05 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >> Yes. It would have been really useful if autofoo used whatever is in
> >> /usr/share/misc, unless there is a config.sub.overrid
On Saturday 18 May 2013 07:45:54 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 16:05 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Yes. It would have been really useful if autofoo used whatever is in
> > /usr/share/misc, unless there is a config.sub.override or
> > config.guess.override file in the sou
On 05/22/2013 10:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> I would MUCH rather see us honor a CONFIG_GUESS and CONFIG_SUB
>> environment variable, rather than baking in a PATH search. This topic
>> has come up in the past, where I made the same request back then.
>
> this might be sufficient for distro pac
On Wednesday 22 May 2013 12:27:38 Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 10:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> I would MUCH rather see us honor a CONFIG_GUESS and CONFIG_SUB
> >> environment variable, rather than baking in a PATH search. This topic
> >> has come up in the past, where I made the same req
(Not sure which list is relevant, so I'm cross-posting to both mingw-users
and autoconf lists)
Hello lists,
when I'm cross compiling from linux x86_64 to 32-bit MinGW autoconf
refuses to detect getaddrinfo and define HAVE_GETADDRINFO. I've limited
the case to the following behaviour:
The "g
Hello,
On 2013-05-22 20:22 +0200, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> The "getaddrinfo-link.c" attached file is a simplification of what
> AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(getaddrinfo) tries to compile and link. It fails to find
> the symbol because gcc most probably doesn't use proper calling
> conventions (stdcall)
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
(Not sure which list is relevant, so I'm cross-posting to both mingw-users
and autoconf lists)
Not a cross-post after all since mingw-users requires registration. I'd
appreciate any help from autoconf people, just make sure you don't CC
mingw-us
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> The fundamental problem, I think, is that you really need the proper
> headers included and AC_REPLACE_FUNCS does not seem to allow you to
> specify the includes. So you probably can't use this macro at all.
>
> You can use AC_LINK_IFELSE to f
On 05/22/2013 02:12 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
>> The fundamental problem, I think, is that you really need the proper
>> headers included and AC_REPLACE_FUNCS does not seem to allow you to
>> specify the includes. So you probably can't use this
10 matches
Mail list logo
