On 05/15/2013 05:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2012 08:46:57 Paul Wise wrote:
So, Debian is in the process of bringing up our upcoming arm64 port.
Unfortunately we are also coming across lots of packages with rather
outdated config.guess and config.sub files (see links below)
Hello,
On Tue, 14 May 2013 23:53:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, Gentoo fixed this for every package in our tree like 9 years ago
> (we added a common function like 11 years ago that ebuilds could call
> manually, but we found that didn't scale). when you run a standard
> autoconf script,
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 09:54:08 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 05:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 08 October 2012 08:46:57 Paul Wise wrote:
> >> So, Debian is in the process of bringing up our upcoming arm64 port.
> >> Unfortunately we are also coming across lots of packages wit
On 05/15/2013 06:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 09:54:08 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/15/2013 05:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2012 08:46:57 Paul Wise wrote:
So, Debian is in the process of bringing up our upcoming arm64 port.
Unfortunately we are also
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 12:26:46 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 06:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 May 2013 09:54:08 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 05/15/2013 05:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On Monday 08 October 2012 08:46:57 Paul Wise wrote:
> So, Debian is in th
Thomas Petazzoni writes:
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 23:53:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> yes, Gentoo fixed this for every package in our tree like 9 years ago
>> (we added a common function like 11 years ago that ebuilds could call
>> manually, but we found that didn't scale). when you run a stan
On 5/15/2013 11:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i understand the point you're making. however, ~10 years of building from
source in Gentoo and doing this for every single build has shown that in
practice, it's irrelevant.
It's irrelevant *for* *Gentoo*. Not all autoconfiscated source trees
are in
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 15:25:31 Warren Young wrote:
> On 5/15/2013 11:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i understand the point you're making. however, ~10 years of building
> > from source in Gentoo and doing this for every single build has shown
> > that in practice, it's irrelevant.
>
> It's irre
Mike Frysinger writes:
> if Gentoo blowing away your rinky dinky config.sub hack breaks your
> project, then take it as a sign that You're Doing It Wrong :).
I think this may be one of those historical momentum things. As INN
maintainer, I used to carry local patches to config.guess and config.
+++ Thomas Petazzoni [2013-05-15 16:30 +0200]:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 23:53:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > yes, Gentoo fixed this for every package in our tree like 9 years ago
> > (we added a common function like 11 years ago that ebuilds could call
> > manually, but we found th
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:30 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 23:53:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > yes, Gentoo fixed this for every package in our tree like 9 years ago
> FWIW, we do the same thing in Buildroot
Yes, it is a very common hack in all of the distros.
It would b
11 matches
Mail list logo
