Hello everybody!
For our scientific software ESPResSo[1], I am trying to get configure to
be able to handle MPI compilers correctly. MPI is a parallelization
library and it often brings its own compiler, i.e. actually it only
brings a wrapper to your compiler, which is usually called mpicc. In our
Hi,
The question is simple, altough the answer it's no so, what does
AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC macro do?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
Sergio Belkin -
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoco
On 12/21/2010 08:02 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The question is simple, altough the answer it's no so, what does
> AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC macro do?
It's a deprecated wrapper around the modern AC_LINK_IFELSE macro. It
basically tests whether a symbol (global variable or function) exists in
the s
Hello again!
On 12/21/2010 03:16 PM, Olaf Lenz wrote:
> The problem seems to be that AC_PROG_CC doesn't work when using it in
> a conditional, is that right? Is there any simple way to do what I
> want?
After some trial and error I have found a solution for my problem that
is very simple. Now I w
On 12/21/2010 07:16 AM, Olaf Lenz wrote:
> I have attached my simplified attempt do this. When I run autoconf, I
> get the warning
>
> configure.ac:4: warning: AC_REQUIRE: `AC_PROG_CC' was expanded before
> it was required
>
> and configure doesn't seem to be looking for mpicc, but always finds
2010/12/21 Eric Blake :
> On 12/21/2010 08:02 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The question is simple, altough the answer it's no so, what does
>> AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC macro do?
>
> It's a deprecated wrapper around the modern AC_LINK_IFELSE macro. It
> basically tests whether a symbol (global var
Hi Olaf, and sorry for the delay in replying, Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:57:04PM CET:
> On 12/21/2010 07:16 AM, Olaf Lenz wrote:
>
> > After some trial and error I have found a solution for my problem that
> > is very simple. Now I wonder whether this is actually the corr
* Bruce Korb wrote on Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:37:58PM CET:
> On 12/20/10 11:20, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > One crucial part is that libtool gets confused whenever it has
> > directories with the wrong ABI in the search path (unlike ld or ld.so,
> > both are in some cases smart enough to skip wrong
