Re: Use resolution file, autoconf help needed

2010-10-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 10/26/2010 07:53 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I already wrote on the bug-autoconf list that this has been fixed in upstream Autoconf 2.60 already. I looked more closely now. The problem is purely libiberty-specific. It still has an old hunk overriding AC_LANG_FUNC_LINK_TRY(C) in libiberty/aclo

Re: Use resolution file, autoconf help needed

2010-10-26 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, thanks, I've comitted the change now. Good to know it is libiberty specific. I wondered how this issue could have survived in autoconf as I am pretty sure other compilers do the same optimization. Honza ___ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org ht

Use resolution file, autoconf help needed

2010-10-26 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, this patch makes GCC to use LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY. Plugin specification says that all symbols resolved as LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY can be removed by the compiler and thus we can bring them local. The patch unfortunately breaks libiberty configure since we start to make whole program

Re: could not setup config headers machinery

2010-10-26 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 10/25/10 07:15 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 10/23/2010 10:25 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: On 10/14/10 09:02 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: checking for IEEE denormalized values... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: error: invalid argument: `Makefile.' Can you send 'diff -u' o

Re: Use resolution file, autoconf help needed

2010-10-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Jan, * Jan Hubicka wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 05:25:51PM CEST: > this patch makes GCC to use LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY. Plugin > specification says that all symbols resolved as > LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY can be removed by the compiler and thus we > can bring them local. The patch unf

using autoconf with ppuxlc++,spuxlc++

2010-10-26 Thread John Wohlbier
I searched the mailing list archives for this question and only found one message containing ppuxlc which didn't answer my question. We're trying to use autoconf in a hybrid environment that includes the CellBE. I have a configure.ac for the CellBE PPE core and one for the SPE core. I also have so

Re: using autoconf with ppuxlc++,spuxlc++

2010-10-26 Thread John Wohlbier
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:31 PM, John Wohlbier wrote: > I searched the mailing list archives for this question and only found one > message containing ppuxlc which didn't answer my question. > > We're trying to use autoconf in a hybrid environment that includes the > CellBE. I have a configure.ac

Re: using autoconf with ppuxlc++,spuxlc++

2010-10-26 Thread Eric Blake
[adding automake, replies can drop autoconf] On 10/26/2010 04:31 PM, John Wohlbier wrote: I searched the mailing list archives for this question and only found one message containing ppuxlc which didn't answer my question. We're trying to use autoconf in a hybrid environment that includes the C