Hi,
how to handle new subdirectories?
1) new automake but no new autoconf directories:
For new subdirectories with new Makefile.am autoconf/automake
fails because Makefile.in seems not to be created automatically,
so we usually add in configure.in a call to a macro similar like
that:
--
According to Vincent Torri on 10/22/2009 11:25 AM:
Hi,
Noticed that this old thread had no takers back when it was first asked...
> configure checks if -R must be followed by a space when checking X. the
> log is:
>
> configure:20215: checking for X
> configure:20450: result: libraries /usr/X11
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 07:00 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> When you have fixed the issue (as described in the other mail)
> and then can reproduce your bug, please also try adding
>AC_PROG_CC
Sure.
> to your configure.ac before the use of LB_LINUX_COMPILE_IFELSE
> and see whether your probl
* Brian J. Murrell wrote on Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:51:08PM CET:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 07:00 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > to your configure.ac before the use of LB_LINUX_COMPILE_IFELSE
> > and see whether your problem goes away that way.
>
> Here's my reproducer:
>
> AC_INIT([pkg], [1.0])
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 22:35 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> So you use Autoconf's AC_LANG_SOURCE but your own version of
> AC_LANG_CONFTEST,
Yes, it would seem so. You will have to excuse my lack of decisiveness
on this. I am more-or-less just getting to the party. :-)
> and the fact that
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 3/2/2010 2:35 PM:
> Second, I do think this is a regression, as our documentation
> pretty clearly states that AC_LANG_SOURCE is the one expanding
> all the AC_DEFINEs seen so far. I do however also think that
> the old code was ugly and hackish. Not sure whether i
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 15:48 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> The change was made back on 2008-11-03 (commit 8e27cc7f5, contained in
> autoconf 2.63b), so although it is somewhat of a regression
> (AC_LANG_CONFTEST outputs defines now, when it did not do so previously),
> there obviously aren't that many
* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:48:54PM CET:
> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 3/2/2010 2:35 PM:
> > Second, I do think this is a regression, as our documentation
> > pretty clearly states that AC_LANG_SOURCE is the one expanding
> > all the AC_DEFINEs seen so far. I do however also
Hello Steffen,
* Steffen Dettmer wrote on Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:25:50PM CET:
> how to handle new subdirectories?
>
> 1) new automake but no new autoconf directories:
>
> For new subdirectories with new Makefile.am autoconf/automake
> fails because Makefile.in seems not to be created automatica
