Re: Are there any tests for Fortran 90 or Fortran 95?

2010-01-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello David, * Dr. David Kirkby wrote on Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:59:50PM CET: > Are there any tests in autoconf that can be used to determine if a > compiler support Fortran 90 or Fortran 95? You can use the second argument to AC_PROG_FC to supply a preferred Fortran dialect. I don't think that

Re: finding the value of a preprocessor symbol

2010-01-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello David, * David Byron wrote on Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:38:03AM CET: > Let's say I have a header file named foo.h that contains: > > #define FOO an_interesting_value > > (I think) I'm looking for a macro like this: > > AC_GET_VALUE([foo.h],[FOO]) > > that populates ac_cv_value_of_FOO with

Re: bison and autotest

2010-01-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Tys, * tys lefering wrote on Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 07:43:53PM CET: > GNU bison is using autotest with 'make maintainer-check' > and that works fine. at failed test lines appear like: > ./regression.at:941: $CXX $CXXFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS -o dancer dancer.cc > $LIBS > is it possible to have

RE: finding the value of a preprocessor symbol

2010-01-24 Thread David Byron
On Sunday, January 24, 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * David Byron wrote on Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:38:03AM CET: > > Let's say I have a header file named foo.h that contains: > > > > #define FOO an_interesting_value > > > > (I think) I'm looking for a macro like this: > > > > AC_GET_VALUE([fo