Re: failure of cross-compilation detection on BlueGene/L

2009-06-08 Thread Steffen Dettmer
Hi all! On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > As you may or may not know, some of the major supercomputers > these days (Cray XT3 and IBM BlueGene) require cross-compiling: > the front-ends run GNU/Linux, but the actual compute nodes run > some half-baked pseudo-POSIX-ish mini

Re: failure of cross-compilation detection on BlueGene/L

2009-06-08 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Steffen Dettmer wrote: Does this mean you have no way to compile any program running on the front-end GNU/Linux? No, if you ./configure without a --host argument it uses the gcc for the front-end (build system) and compiles for the BlueGene front end like one would expect. You mean, you wa

Re: Portability problems in autoconf manual

2009-06-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Eric Blake wrote on Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 06:06:08AM CEST: > [moving to autoconf-patches, replies can drop autoconf] Hmm, it's good to have input from the experience of others on this. > @@ -16345,7 +16355,11 @@ Limitations of Builtins > specified signals to their default values, but many commo

Re: failure of cross-compilation detection on BlueGene/L

2009-06-08 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Steven, * Steven G. Johnson wrote on Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:42:23PM CEST: How do the autoconf developers feel about my proposed solution, which should allow --host to work normally on BlueGene? Sounds fairly safe, although it's not a show-stopper to not have it.