Re: rename gl_FUNC_MBRTOWC

2008-12-18 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Bruno Haible on 12/18/2008 3:44 AM: >> m4_version_prereq([2.60],, [ >> >> It works at least back to Autoconf 2.59. > > Thanks for the hint. But m4_version_prereq is undocumented (as already > mentioned > in [1]). Not for long. I'm co

m4_version_prereq (was: rename gl_FUNC_MBRTOWC)

2008-12-18 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 12/18/2008 6:06 AM: > According to Bruno Haible on 12/18/2008 3:44 AM: >>> m4_version_prereq([2.60],, [ >>> >>> It works at least back to Autoconf 2.59. >> Thanks for the hint. But m4_version_prereq is undocumented (as alre

Re: m4_version_prereq

2008-12-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Eric Blake wrote: > According to Eric Blake on 12/18/2008 6:06 AM: >> According to Bruno Haible on 12/18/2008 3:44 AM: m4_version_prereq([2.60],, [ It works at least back to Autoconf 2.59. >>> Thanks for the hint. But m4_version_prereq is undocumented (as already >>> mentioned >>>

Re: m4_version_prereq

2008-12-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Paolo, all, * Paolo Bonzini wrote on Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 06:09:44PM CET: > > BTW, I'm still planning to look at the zsh bug reported by Ralf > a while ago. Which one was that? > After this, I think we're ready for Autoconf 2.63a, aren't we? :-) I still need to fix Autotest signal handling