Running autoconf make check was prompted by make failure for libtool: No
object files or executables were produced. In retrospect, config.h had two
instances of #include ""
Other info: msys was reinstalled along with all updates which seemed to fix
earlier problems with automake build. m4 was l
testsuite.log may be downloaded from
http://hblarson.home.comcast.net/testsuite.7z
--
Howard Larson
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
Hello Howard,
Thanks for the report. Please, if possible, do not start new threads
for messages to the same topic. Thanks.
* Howard Larson wrote on Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:25:01PM CEST:
>
> Obviously something is broken. Need advice on next course of action; tear
> down the entire system and
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 16:08
To: Howard Larson
Cc: autoconf@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [autoconf 2.63] 95 of 353 tests fail
Hello Howard,
Thanks for the report. Please, if possible, do not start new threads
for me
I have performed a search for a conftest.obj file and it does not exist. As
I mentioned in an earlier email, build of libtool failed to produce any .obj
files.
I have installed MinGW. Does it not have gcc? If not, how do I ensure make
check is using gcc? (I am new to this build environment.)
-
Please don't top-post.
> I have performed a search for a conftest.obj file and it does not exist. As
> I mentioned in an earlier email, build of libtool failed to produce any .obj
> files.
>
> I have installed MinGW. Does it not have gcc? If not, how do I ensure make
> check is using gcc? (I a
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:25:16AM CEST:
> Please don't top-post.
>
> > I have performed a search for a conftest.obj file and it does not exist. As
> > I mentioned in an earlier email, build of libtool failed to produce any .obj
> > files.
> >
> > I have installed MinGW. Does
