Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 21:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think in practice adoption drives portability more than the other way
>> around. I don't think CVS became popular because it was portable;
> Well, I think it became popular, because it had be
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 00:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 21:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I think in practice adoption drives portability more than the other way
> >> around. I don't think CVS became popular because it wa
Paul Smith wrote:
Savannah does not support SubversionSo, I'm stuck with CVS,
Maybe you can switch to Savannah's evil twin, Gna. http://gna.org/
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
On 9/20/07, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very interesting. If various projects flee from CVS to some other
> version control system then I hope that the projects I am involved
> with flee to the same system rather than many different systems.
AFAICT the fleeing is mostly to exactl
Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
> You don't HAVE to install all 132 git-* commands. just plain "git" is
> just hardlinked to all those different names. If you're happy to
> ditch the git file manager, you can just intall 'git' and access its
> subcommands as "git log" / "git pull" / etc. instead of "git-
Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 00:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'm fairly certain that's not the case. The primary advantage of CVS
>> that got people to switch to it was that it did considerably more than
>> RCS and had considerably more available administ
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 02:51 -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> Maybe you can switch to Savannah's evil twin, Gna. http://gna.org/
The software I work on is GNU make. I don't think the FSF (who holds
the copyright) would be too thrilled about it moving to Gna :-).
--
-
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 17:16 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 00:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > True, but do you feel subversion is progress?
>
> Absolutely. Significant progress.
Well my experiences with SVN are different. Esp.
