What is the distinction between AC_PROG_CC_C_O and AC_PROG_CC ??

2007-04-29 Thread Bruce Korb
The index and search of the docs only yields this: `AM_PROG_CC_C_O' This is like `AC_PROG_CC_C_O', but it generates its results in the manner required by automake. You must use this instead of `AC_PROG_CC_C_O' when you need this functionality, that is, when using per-target fl

Re: What is the distinction between AC_PROG_CC_C_O and AC_PROG_CC ??

2007-04-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bruce Korb wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:04:53AM CEST: > The index and search of the docs only yields this: > > `AM_PROG_CC_C_O' > This is like `AC_PROG_CC_C_O', but it generates its results in the > manner required by automake. You must use this instead of > `AC_PROG_CC_C_O'

Re: msgfmt found in path, but $MSGFMT empty

2007-04-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello John, * John Faith wrote on Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:07:19PM CEST: > I am trying to configure Inkscape on OS X 10.3.9 with autoconf 2.61 > from MacPorts. In config.log, I see: > INTLTOOL_MSGFMT='/opt/local/bin/msgfmt' > > , but later: > MSGFMT='' > > , which causes the build to fail sinc

Re: What is the distinction between AC_PROG_CC_C_O and AC_PROG_CC ??

2007-04-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Bruce Korb wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:04:53AM CEST: >> The index and search of the docs only yields this: >> `AM_PROG_CC_C_O' >> This is like `AC_PROG_CC_C_O', but it generates its results in the >> manner required by automake. You

Re: msgfmt found in path, but $MSGFMT empty

2007-04-29 Thread Benoit Sigoure
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Presumably, AC_PROG_INTLTOOL comes from GNOME's intltool package, and the MSGFMT setting from some gettext macros. *sighs* When will people understand the concept of pseudo-reserved-namespace? Is there any reason why autoconf does not emit a warning