Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried finding something in POSIX or C99 that said that an implementation
> could provide long long without unsigned long long, but did not see
> anything obvious
C99 requires both types. C89 requires neither, and Tandem provides just
one of them as an e
Paul Eggert wrote:
Eric Blake writes:
I tried finding something in POSIX or C99 that said that an implementation
could provide long long without unsigned long long, but did not see
anything obvious
C99 requires both types. C89 requires neither, and Tandem provides just
one of them as an exten
Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I'm inclined to agree with Eric's reading of POSIX:
I'm not so inclined, but regardless of the reading that's POSIX
1003.1-2001. The older Tandem release supports an older POSIX
release, and 1003.1-2001's additions are irrelevant to whether
