Hello,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:52:38AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > rm -f -r conftest* confdefs* conf$[$]* $ac_clean_files
>
> How about if you simply remove conf[0-9]* instead? Those file names
> are all reserved by Autoconf anyway. And it's more consistent to
> always remove all of th
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 12:32:54PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:36:31AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > I wrote a quick patch; please find it attached to this mail. Is it OK?
>
> This works for me in both version mismatch directions.
OK, I committed. The patch is
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:50:48PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The attached patch is necessary as if you set the environment variable M4
> > to "m4 --nesting-limit=2048", the regexp won't match as there is a '='
> > rather than a ' ' after nesting-l
Hi,
I am having a little trouble using autoconf to configure my package.
Currently, I am tring to build a package that depends on another
package. Basically CGDB (main package) depends on Readline (second
package).
I am using
AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS(readline-5.0)
to configure readline. This works
Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But when we got that far, is there any reason why Autoconf tests should
> use conf$$*? Isn't conf2.obj or conftest2.obj cleaner?
You could talk me into that, yes, though it's a more global change.
___
Autoco
