Hi all,
First of all, sorry if you have received this mail two times.
My question is: How can I set a default progra-prefix without the need
to explicitely pass it whith: ./configure --program-prefix ...
Another question is: Once the user sets it using ./configure --program-
prefix, which vari
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 16:31, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:05:12PM +0100, Gregorio Guidi wrote:
> > Note: as you can see, the patch assumes there will be a solution for the
> > "AC_REQUIRE in shell conditional" issue.
>
> actually, I believe that both my proposals will get
JRBCAST wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, sorry if you have received this mail two times.
My question is: How can I set a default progra-prefix without the need
to explicitely pass it whith: ./configure --program-prefix ...
Look for AC_PREFIX_PROGRAM in the autoconf manual (4.12).
Another question i
Thanks for your response, but it is not the kind of prefix I am looking
for. I am looking for the prefix prepended to the program name when
doing:
make install
For example, if my library has two programs, foo1 and foo2, and I do:
./configure --program-prefix=foopref_
when I do make install, i
Hi,
> > Somewhere early during ./configure, the host type is checked. If it is
> > GNU (Hurd), an ordinary build is prepared. (Checking libs, using
> > automake-generated makefile etc.) However, if it's Linux, the behaviour
> > changes completely: All the ordinary checks are skipped; instead of an
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:53:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Somewhere early during ./configure, the host type is checked. If it is
> > > GNU (Hurd), an ordinary build is prepared. (Checking libs, using
> > > automake-generated makefile etc.) However, if it's Linux, the behavio
On 14-Feb-2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'd like to know whether the following scenario is possible with
| Autoconf:
|
| Somewhere early during ./configure, the host type is checked. If it is
| GNU (Hurd), an ordinary build is prepared. (Checking libs, using
| automake-gene
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 12:57:20PM -0500, Dan Manthey wrote:
> Well, trivially, it's possible to run an arbitrary number of tests
> together and see if _none_ of them fail: `cc foo.c bar.c' and then only
> run them separately if there is a failure. it might also be possible with
> some
