On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 20:53 +0100, Francesco Zappa Nardelli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am a novice user of autoconf, and I am sorry if my question is
> really silly.
>
> I am looking for a way to tell configure that the makefile it
> eventually generates should include the file "linux.mak" if we are
>
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:28:36AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > $ autoreconf
> > autoreconf: configure.ac: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is used, but not
> > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION
> 1. The automake example of AM_GNU_GETTEXT does not show
> AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION being used in conjunction with it.
> I
Francesco Zappa Nardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello.
>
> I am a novice user of autoconf, and I am sorry if my question is
> really silly.
>
> I am looking for a way to tell configure that the makefile it
> eventually generates should include the file "linux.mak" if we are
> building the s
Hello Dan,
thank you very much for your work. It sounds like a very useful cleanup.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:00:59PM -0500, Dan Manthey wrote:
> I realized that not only needn't config.status do the job of breaking the
> sed program up into fragments, it needn't do the job of escaping the
> re
I'm using gentoo,
I've tried the following code with autoconf version 2.13 and 2.59
configure.in
Code:
AC_INIT ([main.c])
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([wewa], [0.0.1])
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_INSTALL
dnl == Requirements
===
LIBGLADE_REQUIRED=2.3.6
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:18:30PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> I've tried the following code with autoconf version 2.13 and 2.59
please use 2.59, which is the current version.
> AC_INIT ([main.c])
...
> ./configure: line 523: main.c: command not found
Use:
AC_INIT([main.c])
(no space),
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:19:33 +0100, Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:18:30PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> > I've tried the following code with autoconf version 2.13 and 2.59
>
> please use 2.59, which is the current version.
>
> > AC_INIT ([main.c])
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:15:37PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> I have an other problem not really autoconf related more automake I
> think but far from sure.
I'd also day it's an automake problem, as the depcomp script is distributed
with automake.
Try going to automake@gnu.org, mentioning
> So the gcc ... are in fact parameters to the depcomp script.
> Try running the whole
> source='main.c' ... /bin/sh ./depcomp ...
>
> Does it create main.o? If notm try to debug the shell script.
Yes it does , there's no ./depcomp file !
___
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:37 am, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:28:36AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > > $ autoreconf
> > > autoreconf: configure.ac: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is used, but not
> > > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION
>
> > 1. The automake example of AM_GNU_GETTEXT does not show
> >
In general you do not want to do this. As an example my code needs to
run on various versions of Solaris. Newer versions have the C library
functin "strlcpy" both versions have "strncpy". I want to use the "l'
version if it is available. So rather then testing for the Solaris
version I test if
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > Rather than counting the delimiters to just _notice_ when an output
> > variable containing the delimiter would foul up the escaping mechanism, I
> > use it to instead modify the delimiter and redo the whole process. It's
> > now guaranteed to alway
* Jonas Geiregat wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:50:15PM CET:
> > So the gcc ... are in fact parameters to the depcomp script.
> > Try running the whole
> > source='main.c' ... /bin/sh ./depcomp ...
> >
> > Does it create main.o? If notm try to debug the shell script.
> Yes it does , the
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:29:45 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try running
> automake --add
> once.
I already fixed it with automake -af
But thanks anyway, also the --add option isn't in automake --help nor
is there a automake man page ?! is this normal ?
___
* Jonas Geiregat wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:54:59PM CET:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:29:45 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Try running
> > automake --add
> > once.
>
> I already fixed it with automake -af
> But thanks anyway, also the --add option isn't in automake
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:04:53 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually forgot that its name is --add-missing (short: -a).
> This option is documented.
But no man page ?
I forgot to mention an other question when running aclocal I get alot
of warnings, what does this mean ?
/us
* Jonas Geiregat wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:09:21PM CET:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:04:53 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I actually forgot that its name is --add-missing (short: -a).
> > This option is documented.
>
> But no man page ?
Well, this depends, actually.
>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:37 am, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:28:36AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
>> > > $ autoreconf
>> > > autoreconf: configure.ac: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is used, but not
>> > > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSIO
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:47 pm, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Bruce> Um, okay, but if automake is going to emit the message, then it only
> Bruce> makes sense (to me) that automake include the documentation.
>
> That would make sense to me too. However automake is not
> emitting the mess
Here's what I hope is a final solution to multiline output variables and
the related rework of _AC_OUTPUT_FILES.
I needed to change the delimeter to not contain @, since I now escape all
@ in output variable values as |[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#|. No, there's no really
good reason
that I chose this str
20 matches
Mail list logo
