Hello,
this sounds very interesting. I admit I don't fully understand your code
so please forgive me any errors in the following comments:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 05:49:36PM -0500, Dan Manthey wrote:
> It appears to me that since the set of substitutions is fixed at the time
> of running autocon
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:49:54PM +0100, Peter Simons wrote:
> I have applied the last patch you sent to the macro and
...
> dnl @author Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ...
Thanks. Perhaps we should give credit to Andreas, too.
There is still one problem with the macro--it changes prefix
Stepan Kasal writes:
> There is still one problem with the macro--it changes
> prefix=NONE to prefix="$ac_default_prefix", so subsequent
> macros don't have the information whether prefix is
> defaulted or not.
> The patch attached to this mail fixes this issue.
I have applied the patch mom
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You decided to use 2), which is the most correct solution. Unfortunately,
> the performance penalty may be high. I'm afraid it's to high to be worth it.
Yeah, that's what I was afraid of.
>
> I think that if we choose a sufficiently unusu
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:13:11AM +0100, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:56:16AM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> > s/[^t]$/&\\/ does not do the job?
>
> I don't think so. What if the substituted value were "first\nsecond"?
> The newline wouldn't get escaped.
Oops. I stopped thinkin
