Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?

2004-12-21 Thread Bruce Korb
On Monday 20 December 2004 01:48 am, Paul Eggert wrote: > Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Underpinning this is the idea that long examples should be GPL'd, as > > opposed as "are de facto" as of today. Why should they? > > Well, let's be concrete about this and take one example f

Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?

2004-12-21 Thread Bruce Korb
On Monday 20 December 2004 11:23 am, Paul Eggert wrote: > Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Piffle". It is a trivial example. > > Well, it doesn't really matter what you or I think is trivial: what > counts is what a federal judge would think (in the US, anyway). It would be difficu