-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are there any tests I can use to specify that I want a C99 compiler?
AC_PROG_CC isn't sufficient.
Would it be possible to introduce a macro to select the C standard
required (K&R, C89, C99)?
Ideally it could just detemine that gcc could accept the "-
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there any tests I can use to specify that I want a C99 compiler?
> AC_PROG_CC isn't sufficient.
IMHO the preferred way is to check for the specific features you need
(eg. with AC_COMPILE_IFELSE) and abort when not provided (or maybe use
workarounds in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Are there any tests I can use to specify that I want a C99 compiler?
>> AC_PROG_CC isn't sufficient.
>
> IMHO the preferred way is to check for the specific feat
Roger Leigh wrote:
and these work well. What it doesn't do is let me use features such
as mixed declarations and code. These require you to use "gcc
-std=c99" or "c99" or similar, and I can't enable this portably. If
autoconf could find out how to put a given compiler into C99 mode,
that would b
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
and these work well. What it doesn't do is let me use features such
as mixed declarations and code. These require you to use "gcc
-std=c99" or "c99" or similar, and I can't enable this portably. If
autoconf could find out how to put a given compiler int
