Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Eric Sunshine a dit: > Hello, > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:06:55 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote: >> I just grabbed the tarball, and it works fine here >> I tried with a more recent CVS m4, and with Debian's with success in >> both >> cases. Both M4 did produce exactly the same output. > > How ve

Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:10:46 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote: > Wow. Did you try using --melt, as I suggested? I am sorry, but I have not seen a suggestion regarding --melt. I double-checked my mail folder, as well as the autoconf mail archive, but found no reference to --melt. Did I miss

Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Akim Demaille
>> How very strange. Your successes prompted me to expand my testing to >> additional platforms. In addition to my earlier trials, I used the >> SourceForge CompileFarm machines, a MacOS/X machine to which I have >> shell >> access, and asked one of the other Crystal Space developers to test with

Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:10:46 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote: > Maybe you could try > the m4 I installed again, since I had a couple of additional > initializations that were missing, and caused valgrind to barf. > (Same place, same name, different contents). I re-tested using the newer m4 on fo

Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:58:54 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote: > Could you make the test case smaller? Are you sure all the tests were > run with the modified m4? Okay, I narrowed down the "excess arguments to m4_pushdef" to the following tiny case: AC_INIT([crystal], [1], [someone]) AC_ARG_E

Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:58:54 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote: > Could you make the test case smaller? Are you sure all the tests were > run with the modified m4? I was able to narrow down the "failed with exit status: 139" error to the following tiny case: AC_INIT([crystal], [1], [someone])

Re: How many packages use autotools?

2003-09-28 Thread Earnie Boyd
Joseph D. Wagner wrote: Pretty wild statement, especially considering the existance of the Cygwin Net Release. As far as I am aware, all packages contained in it are built using an autoconf-based ./configure script. Check out http://cygwin.com/. They use their own customized install agent (http://c

Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Eric Sunshine a dit: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:58:54 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote: >> Could you make the test case smaller? Are you sure all the tests were >> run with the modified m4? > > Okay, I narrowed down the "excess arguments to m4_pushdef" to the > following > tiny case: > > AC_INIT([

Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Eric Sunshine a dit: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:58:54 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote: >> Could you make the test case smaller? Are you sure all the tests were >> run with the modified m4? > > I was able to narrow down the "failed with exit status: 139" error to the > following tiny case: > > AC_

Re: Autoconf 2.57d instability

2003-09-28 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:13:59 +0200 (CEST), Akim Demaille wrote: > Arg... Now I understand why I didn't see the failure: I'm using CVS > Autoconf, and AC_HELP_STRING has just been fixed since then :( I'm > sorry for the waste of time... I grabbed the AC_HELP_STRING patch from CVS, and am happy to

Official notice to all e-gold users

2003-09-28 Thread e-gold Ltd
Dear e-gold account owner! This message was sent to your mailbo because you have an active account. At the end of each month due to our database's maintenance you need to confirm your account's information. To do this please click on the following link to get to the e-gold secure page and re-e

autoconf 1.7

2003-09-28 Thread Roopa Prabhu
Can anybody direct me to autoconf 1.7 download. Cause i tried searching for it, but in vain. Regards, Roopa Prabhu