Re: GNU ftp crack and config.{sub,guess}

Paul D. Smith wrote: I'm still waiting for _ANY_ kind of response here. Doesn't anyone know or care about config.guess or config.sub anymore? From automake manual: config.guess config.sub These programs compute the canonical triplets for the given build, host, or target architecture. These progra

Re: HPUX and +DAportable

Joe Buehler writes: > The IBM AIX compilers do the equivalent of +DAportable by default. For HP, > you have to tell the compiler to produce a binary that will run on various > kinds of processors. Hey Joe, put the following lines into your .profile file: CCOPTS='+DAportable' export C

Re: HPUX and +DAportable

Joe Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a mix of PA-RISC 1.1 and 2.0 processors and am continually having > to manually add +DAportable to compile flags in order to get binaries to > run on both kinds of machines (since I compile on a PA-RISC 2.0 machine). > > Is there some reason this i

automake/autoconf issues on a sun

Togethor with a collaborator, we are putting togethor a gnu-like package for some scientific analysis. We have it running on Linux, HP, SGI with both gcc and native compilers but have run in to some problems on two Sun's; maybe someone can make suggestions. 1) One of the systems has both X11R5 and

Re: HPUX and +DAportable

Paul Eggert wrote: > Joe Buehler writes: > > I have a mix of PA-RISC 1.1 and 2.0 processors and am continually having > > to manually add +DAportable to compile flags in order to get binaries to > > run on both kinds of machines (since I compile on a PA-RISC 2.0 machine). > > > > Is there some rea

Re: HPUX and +DAportable

Schleicher Ralph (LLI) wrote: put the following lines into your .profile file: CCOPTS='+DAportable' export CCOPTS LDOPTS='+vnocompatwarnings +s' export LDOPTS The last two lines make libtool happy. Thank you, that is what I am going to do. -- Joe Buehler

extended version in AC_INIT ?

AC_INIT (PACKAGE, VERSION, [BUG-REPORT], [TARNAME]) is it possible to have something "more advanced" than just 2.31? Suppose I want to use "2.31" in file names (e.g., tar name) and "2.31 (2003-09-01)" for everything else. Suggestions? -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k

Re: automake/autoconf issues on a sun

"L. D. Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) One of the systems has both X11R5 and X11R6 and it > looks like AC_PATH_XTRA may be getting confused about > which one to use. Does it seach by decreasing or increasing > release? I think it uses the first release it finds. The details are hairy tho

Detecting availability of a shared libray

Hi all, I have a package that produces a shared/static library via libtool. However this package needs to make use of some external library for data import/export. Since my library has both a shared and a static version this external library also needs to have at least a shared version availab

Re: am I missing something about configuration headers?

>>> "Dale" == Dale E Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Dale> AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([FooConfig.h:FooConfig.h.in]) Dale> AC_OUTPUT(Makefile) AC_CONFIG_FILES([ FooConfig.h:FooConfig.h.in Makefile ]) AC_OUTPUT [...] -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: config.sub, config.guess, and the GNU FTP site

%% Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: pe> Ben, would you like to have checkin privileges to gnulib? pe> Then you can simply install the latest versions there. In another message, John Eaton seems to imply that there's already a "config" Savannah project that contains these files in CVS.

Re: GNU ftp crack and config.{sub,guess}

%% Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: rs> Paul D. Smith wrote: >> I'm still waiting for _ANY_ kind of response here. >> Doesn't anyone know or care about config.guess or config.sub anymore? rs> From automake manual: rs> config.guess rs> config.sub rs> These programs compute

Re: config.sub, config.guess, and the GNU FTP site

> In another message, John Eaton seems to imply that there's already a > "config" Savannah project that contains these files in CVS. In > fact, I can find it there now that I know about it :). Yes, that's correct. Ben

am I missing something about configuration headers?

I've got the following configure.ac: [configure.ac] dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script. AC_INIT( [foo.cpp] ) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE( [foo], [v0] ) dnl Require GNU Autoconf version 2.57 or later AC_PREREQ(2.57) AC_PROG_CXX AC_ARG_VAR([SSH], [When spawning remote