Re: Get rid of `-g' in CXXFLAGS

2003-08-02 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 23:44, Harlan Stenn wrote: > It's not that hard to get rid of a flag. > > nCFLAGS= > for i in $CFLAGS > do >case "$i" in > -g) ;; > *) nCFLAGS="$nCFLAGS $i" ;; >esac > done > CFLAGS=nCFLAGS That will also purge -g if it was added explicitly by the user. --

Re: Get rid of `-g' in CXXFLAGS

2003-08-02 Thread Richard Bos
Op vrijdag 1 augustus 2003 21:38, schreef Frank A. Uepping: > Unfortuantely AC_PROG_CXX includes the `-g' option in CXXFLAGS, > with what I am not happy with. > How can I get rid of the `-g' flag in a way that doesn't *clobber* a user > supplied CXXFLAGS? > (However, I assume resetting CXXFLAGS ent

Re: Get rid of `-g' in CXXFLAGS

2003-08-02 Thread John Burger
See: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2003-04/msg00016.html and the related messages for some possibly relevant discussion. That thread is about giving libexecdir a different default, but I came away with the general impression that it is difficult to change the default defaults of

Re: Get rid of `-g' in CXXFLAGS

2003-08-02 Thread Bob Proulx
Frank A. Uepping wrote: > I want CXXFLAGS without the -g flag BY DEFAULT! > Because the normal user doesn't want a bloat bin with debug information. Could you be specific about your concerns? There should be no bloat when compiled with -g. That just enables debug symbols to be present in the dev

Re: Get rid of `-g' in CXXFLAGS

2003-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
It's not that hard to get rid of a flag. nCFLAGS= for i in $CFLAGS do case "$i" in -g) ;; *) nCFLAGS="$nCFLAGS $i" ;; esac done CFLAGS=nCFLAGS

Re: Accessing AC_DEFINE'd var

2003-08-02 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Frank" == Frank A Uepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Frank> (I am wondering that AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE doesn't use PACKAGE_* by default.) `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([OPTIONS])' `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(PACKAGE, VERSION, [NO-DEFINE])' Runs many macros required for proper operation of the generated

Re: Get rid of `-g' in CXXFLAGS

2003-08-02 Thread Guido Draheim
Braden McDaniel wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 23:44, Harlan Stenn wrote: It's not that hard to get rid of a flag. nCFLAGS= for i in $CFLAGS do case "$i" in -g) ;; *) nCFLAGS="$nCFLAGS $i" ;; esac done CFLAGS=nCFLAGS That will also purge -g if it was added explicitly by the user.

Re: Get rid of `-g' in CXXFLAGS

2003-08-02 Thread Frank A. Uepping
On Saturday 02 August 2003 07:46, Richard Bos wrote: > Op vrijdag 1 augustus 2003 21:38, schreef Frank A. Uepping: > > Unfortuantely AC_PROG_CXX includes the `-g' option in CXXFLAGS, > > with what I am not happy with. > > How can I get rid of the `-g' flag in a way that doesn't *clobber* a user > >

We can find you the best rates on any number of loans

2003-08-02 Thread jenny hewit
7268et133d3zv39w58sj7hega10d005a2u184825yfx2x62y898ve544c3bo337l 5w422g011qy090k91219f578o1m76x96et133d3zv39w58sj7hega10d005a2u182g011qy090k91219f578o1m76x9659454i4407032bv3i6h2r601746b9zj97268 et133d3zv39w58sj7hega10d005a2u184825yfx2x62y898ve544c3bo337l5w422g011qy090k91219f578o1m76x965945 4i44

Re: Get rid of `-g' in CXXFLAGS

2003-08-02 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 17:40, Frank A. Uepping wrote: > I want CXXFLAGS without the -g flag BY DEFAULT! > Because the normal user doesn't want a bloat bin with debug information. Normal users aren't going to care. And for users who do care, there is the "install-strip" make target. -- Braden McD

Info: Extra Geld Verdien im Internet ohne Bürostress!!

2003-08-02 Thread mcloni
Sind Sie Student? Haben Sie Familie? Haben Sie Arbeit? Verdienen Sie Genug Geld? Wissen Sie Noch Wie Lange? ***

AC_CHECK_HEADER and kernel header files

2003-08-02 Thread Frank A. Uepping
I want to check for a kernel header file with AC_CHECK_HEADER. E.g.: AC_CHECK_HEADER([cdrom.h],, [AC_MSG_ERROR([cdrom.h not found])]) ./configure CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/include/linux gives me: checking cdrom.h usability... no checking cdrom.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: cdrom.h: present but cannot

Re: how to determine that UNIX Advisory lock availability

2003-08-02 Thread Richard Bos
No one? No hint, advice or what so ever...? Op donderdag 31 juli 2003 15:52, schreef Richard Bos: > Hello, > > My next question, is about how to determine that UNIX Advisory lock can > be used on a system. This is used in the database application that I'm > trying to port to the autoconf. The d

Re: [PATCH] Improve AC_CHECK_TOOL, introduce AC_CHECK_TARGET_TOOL(v. 4)

2003-08-02 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Ping! I've been paperwork-complete for quite a while. Please take a look at my patch from January: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2003-01/msg00014.html For notes on the patch, and ChangeLog entry, see http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2003-01/msg00012.html Alter

AC_PROG_CC & user supplied CC

2003-08-02 Thread Frank A. Uepping
The AC_PROG_CC/CXX are searching for a compiler. Will the found compiler being used to compile the feature tests? E.g.: does AC_CHECK_HEADER(...) use the compiler determined by AC_PROG_CC? What about when the user supplies a compiler via `./configure CC=mygcc'; is that compiler used instead of th

how to determine block size

2003-08-02 Thread Richard Bos
Is it possible to determine/get the block size that can be used by a system? I have the information below that provides some insight, but is it possible to obtain this information from configure? Size of DB input buffer blocks. Normally, this is set by indicating which machine you are on