Re: checks fail -- why?

2003-07-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |> some checks on cygwin fail. how do I figure out why? Look at config.log. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 827

Re: autoheader produces files which choke configure

2003-07-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |> configure.in: |> AC_FUNC_ALLOCA |> |> ==> config.h.in: |> /* Define to 1 if you have and it should be used (not on Ultrix). |>*/ |> #undef HAVE_ALLOCA_H |> |> $ bash -x -n configure |> ==> |> modules/regexp/config.h.in: line 14: syntax error near

Re: AC_CHECK_DECL+autoheader ==> nothing in config.h.in?

2003-07-28 Thread Derek Robert Price
Sam Steingold wrote: I put AC_CHECK_DECL(signgam) in configure.in to check for the lgamma() sign indicator. I expected autoheader to place "#undef HAVE_DECL_SIGNGAM" in config.h.in, but it does not do that. Do I _have_ to use the full version, like AC_CHECK_DECL(signgam, AC_DEFINE([HAVE_DECL_SIGNG

Re: AC_CHECK_DECL+autoheader ==> nothing in config.h.in?

2003-07-28 Thread Sam Steingold
> * In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * On the subject of "Re: AC_CHECK_DECL+autoheader ==> nothing in config.h.in?" > * Sent on Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:07:57 -0400 > * Honorable Derek Robert Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sam Steingold wrote: > > >I put AC_CHECK_DECL(signgam) in configure.in to

Re: AC_CHECK_DECL+autoheader ==> nothing in config.h.in?

2003-07-28 Thread Derek Robert Price
Sam Steingold wrote: AC_CHECK_DECLS defines the config.h.in variable automatically. If you want to use AC_CHECK_DECL, yes, you have to use a construct like you mentioned. Thank you very much. what about ? how do I have included during the check for signgam without having to define [ACTION-I