Thank you for your reply.
It appears we have different viewpoints of what needs a rationale. I,
and a substantial portion of the C++ programming community, tend to
take what may be termed a minimalist view: why should I have to pay
for a feature I don't want and have no need for? Others, at le
I have a question about the old files from 2.13 that is not covered
in the manual. I was unable to connect to the list archive for some
reason, so apologies if this has been asked before.
This is what I have at the moment;
% /bin/ls -F /usr/local/gnu/share/autoconf/
acconfig.h acidentifier
Niko Nikolov - software developer:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.geocities.com/nikolov99/mainpage.htm
On Sun, 2002-07-07 at 17:15, Walter E. Brown wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> It appears we have different viewpoints of what needs a rationale. I,
> and a substantial portion of the C++ programming community, tend to
> take what may be termed a minimalist view: why should I have to pay
>
> From: "Walter E. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:15:34 -0500
> I am merely trying to point out that the status quo causes
> significant difficulties,
Sorry, I don't see the significant difficulties. We're not talking
about your main software; we're just talking about li
