Re: Appending to config.log

2002-05-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Akim Demaille writes: > If AC_RUN_COMMAND or similar fulfils, your needs, would that be > enough, or would you still need some form of AC_MSG_LOG? I've had a need for writing specific messages into the log. Here's a snippet that tests whether Ant (the java build tool) works: pgac_cmd='$ANT

macros for rpath support

2002-05-21 Thread Bruno Haible
The "GNU build system" has a solution for _building_ shared libraries portably, namely libtool. As paradoxical as it sounds, it does not yet have a solution for _using_ shared libraries portably. The linker command line for using a shared library is fortunately the same everywhere on Unix, namel

Re: macros for rpath support

2002-05-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Bruno Haible wrote: > So I set out and realized in gettext-0.11.2 a solution of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH [...] Weird as it may sound, is it easy to _disable_ such feature? We have our own reasons for not wanting rpath information in our Debian packages (which are beyond the scope

[RE]¿Àºü ¾îÁ¦ Áñ°Å¿ü¾î¿ä.

2002-05-21 Thread ¹Ú¼±¹Ì
pcbang2.html Description: Binary data

Re: make flavor checks?

2002-05-21 Thread Ely Levy
There isn't any, as autoconf is working hand to hand with automake, personaly I find it annoying I don't like automake and I think it would take a very long time till it would produce a small portable make file. I guess you can check for the existing of gmake and then try to run it with the param

Re: Appending to config.log

2002-05-21 Thread Mark D. Roth
On Mon May 20 12:01 2002 +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: > Your need is very legitimate! The main problem is that the behavior > of one such macro is very unclear, especially because there are > several possible evaluation schemes of the COMMANDS (e.g., the > compiling macros need the COMMANDS to be

Re: Site Macro Directory

2002-05-21 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> > Part two, designating a single directory as the site directory is not > > going to be liked by everybody. If Autoconf is installed as part of "the > > system" under /usr, many people won't like to put AC files belonging to > > "locally" installed packages somewhere under /usr/share or whereev

COLLEGATI E...

2002-05-21 Thread 100milasuonerie.com
Title: Untitled Document

Re: Site Macro Directory

2002-05-21 Thread Mark D. Roth
On Tue May 21 10:52 2002 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > I think it would work better to choose a scheme that would let a given > autoconf user specify some list of site-wide directories for their > own use, with the default being to use just the /usr/local/whatever > directory specified at inst

Take a peek, its FREE!

2002-05-21 Thread
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ´ÔÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ÁÖ¹®ÀÌ Á¢¼öµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. Àü¼Û ½Ã°¢ : Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 09:06:13 --- :: FREE Entry! FREE Membership! Don't know how long this GREAT offer will last, but :don't miss your chance TODAY! W

Re: macros for rpath support

2002-05-21 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:45:46 +0200 (CEST) > > I would propose this facility for inclusion in GNU autoconf. The reason is > that although it has been developed to deal with -lintl and -liconv, the > macros are generally useful and can equally well be u