> "Patrick" == Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 05:40:25PM +0200, Akim Demaille
Patrick> wrote:
>> Heck, it is right! How come I did not see that failure :(
>>
>> Try this one.
Patrick> It seems to do the same as before..
I've changed of strategy
Some bugs were found in 2.53, hence 2.54 will be released shortly. In
addition, as Darwin is now more popular, addressing its portability
issues has become a requirement for Autoconf.
This prerelease reflects faithfully the next release. Please, try it
exhaustively, so that we can soon release
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> * tests/m4sh.at (LINENO): Skip the test if LINENO cannot be unset.
> Fixes false failures on Darwin.
Still same as before, but at least the mystery as to why it worked on
1 NetBSD computer and not 2 others is: the one
> From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:47:16 +0100
>
> Is there a way of seeing which shell it decided to use?
grep CONFIG_SHELL config.status
> "Patrick" == Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Akim Demaille
Patrick> wrote:
>> * tests/m4sh.at (LINENO): Skip the test if LINENO cannot be unset.
>> Fixes false failures on Darwin.
Patrick> Still same as before, but at least the
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:57:52PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I really thought you were under Darwin, all my apologies. In that
> case, could run the test suite of the just released snapshot, and send
> the testsuite.log to bug-autoconf? We'll start from scratch :(
It's on its way..
Patrick
> "Zdenek" == Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zdenek> I'm of course using config.cache - so that's why I'm complaing about
Zdenek> Makefile creation - as the time of makefile processing is
Zdenek> aproximately 3 times as big as the whole process of detectecion.
Zdenek> That's why
[ I'm a bit behind on my autoconf email ]
Peter> Would it be OK to remove profiling output files (gmon.out,
Peter> bb.out, any others?) in _AC_RUN_IFELSE? When I want to profile
Peter> my code I configure with CFLAGS='-pg', so all the test program
Peter> runs in configure leave garbage lying aro
Tom Tromey writes:
> Peter> Would it be OK to remove profiling output files (gmon.out,
> Peter> bb.out, any others?) in _AC_RUN_IFELSE? When I want to profile
> Peter> my code I configure with CFLAGS='-pg', so all the test program
> Peter> runs in configure leave garbage lying around.
>
> Akim>
> Automake must rewrite the user's Makefile.am code to change
> @foo@ to $(foo). This ensures there are no rewrites in the
> generated Makefile.in. This will break compatibility :-(.
Wrong emoticon. Use: >:-( instead. ;-)
Actually, a compatibility change is really okay, _as_long_as_
the
> Unfortunately, some of the developers I'm working with would rather
> not upgrade to 2.52 (I have some sympathy with that, it can be pretty
> annoying) so I thought I'd make my compiler macro work with 2.13 as
> well.
I understand that there has been some recent work (esp. in automake) to
ena
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED],As seen on NBC, CBS, CNN, and even Oprah!
The health discovery that actually reverses aging while burning
fat, without dieting or exercise! This proven discovery has
even been reported on by the New England Journal of Medicine.
Forget aging and dieting fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
