When I run autoconf 2.53 in gcc-3.0.4/gcc, I get
configure.in:1496: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_SPARC64_FLAG
This is a bug in autoconf. I think the message above should
be changed to be non-fatal, since autoconf does not know that every
identifier begining with AS_ is ne
autoconf-2.53 does not allow AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED variables
that begin with "AS_", reserving that part of the name space for
autoconf m4sugar macros. I think autoconf should allow this and
just issue a warning, but it would probably be a good idea to fix
the gcc tree to avoid this, even if
Sorry, I forgot to attach the actual patch to my previous
email.
Adam J. Richter __ __ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:08:30AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> autoconf-2.53 does not allow AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED variables
> that begin with "AS_", reserving that part of the name space for
> autoconf m4sugar macros. I think autoconf should allow this and
> just issue a warning, but it wo
Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen projects using macros that start
>with AC_ (orbit has one, I think).
That should not be a problem. Autoconf only aborts this way
if it thinks you are probably trying to use an autoconf macro and a
macro by that name is
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:16:19AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> >there's no good reason for autoconf to start poaching on symbols that
> >don't begin with AC_. File it as a bug in autoconf.
>
> Recent versions of autoconf appear to split a lot of the autconf
> functionality between auto
Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:08:30AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> > autoconf-2.53 does not allow AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED variables
> > that begin with "AS_", reserving that part of the name space for
> > autoconf m4sugar macros. I think autoconf should allow this and
>
>there's no good reason for autoconf to start poaching on symbols that
>don't begin with AC_. File it as a bug in autoconf.
Recent versions of autoconf appear to split a lot of the autconf
functionality between autoconf proper and "m4 sugar." I think the
idea is that the m4sugar code co
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:33:32AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen projects using macros that start
> with AC_ (orbit has one, I think). Maybe they do this for macros
> they want to propose for inclusion in autoconf. Will autoconf
> choke on these, too?
to be consist
Dan Kegel writes:
> Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen projects using macros that start
> with AC_ (orbit has one, I think). Maybe they do this for macros
> they want to propose for inclusion in autoconf. Will autoconf
> choke on these, too?
You're missing the point. The reason for this check is
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 05:17:40PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Dan Kegel writes:
>
> > Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen projects using macros that start
> > with AC_ (orbit has one, I think). Maybe they do this for macros
> > they want to propose for inclusion in autoconf. Will autoconf
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo