Am Die, 2002-02-26 um 08.44 schrieb Zack Weinberg:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 07:13:17AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > I think, you are actually describing at least 3 different problems at
> > the same time.
> >
> > 1. Building arbitrary c-libraries while building gcc.
> > 2. Building libstdc+
> From: Jeroen van den Muyzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:39:57 +1100 (EST)
>
> Good example is OpenLDAP, autoconf used there recognised (incorrectly) our
> Cray as a C90 ('twas good enough). Recent versions of autoconf have dropped
> that.
That's not an Autoconf issue; i
> From: Len Makin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:56:24 +1100
> What about something like if or case to check
> # Check for NEC SX compiler
> if cc -c -V 2>&1 | grep '/SX' > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
> # action for NEC
I'd rather that Autoconf continues to avoid that kind of approach
Title: Oº»¸ÞÀÏÀºÁ¤º¸Åë½Å¸ÁÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø¹×Á¤º¸º¸È£µî¿¡°üÇѹý·üÁ¦50Á¶¿¡ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ[±¤°í]¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù
O º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦
50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´ÙO e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼 ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö
¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ¿øÇÏ½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡¿
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:44:32PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> But that's a tricky road. First, we need evidence that the recent
> re-execing is not enough. Thanks!
According to David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, AIX's /bin/sh and
/bin/ksh support $LINENO but have the same performance pro
> From: Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:37:08 -0800
>
> According to David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, AIX's /bin/sh and
> /bin/ksh support $LINENO but have the same performance problem with
> here documents. That means the _test_ as implemented is not good
> enou
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:56:10PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > From: Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:37:08 -0800
> >
> > According to David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, AIX's /bin/sh and
> > /bin/ksh support $LINENO but have the same performance problem with
> >
> From: Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:21:14 -0800
>
> In this case, we know that the problem is due to the creation of
> thousands of temporary files which each subshell invocation creates
> hard links to. If, I say if, someone can generate a small script
> that c
