Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --

2001-10-31 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:44:43PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > > From: Paul Townsend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 02:21:48 -0500 (EST) > > > I just upgraded from autoconf-2.13 to autoconf-2.52 and either I > > have done something incredibly stupid (an always present > > possibil

Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --

2001-10-31 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> From: Paul Townsend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 >> 02:21:48 -0500 (EST) >> I just upgraded from autoconf-2.13 to autoconf-2.52 and either I >> have done something incredibly stupid (an always present >> possibility) or the

Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --

2001-10-31 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Thomas" == Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thomas> there were claims on this mailing list that 2.50 was 3 times Thomas> faster than 2.13 (so you're saying that 2.52x is ~60 times Thomas> slower than 2.50) Wow! That's quite impressive. Who said that about autoconf?

Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --

2001-10-31 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On 31 Oct 2001, Akim Demaille wrote: > > "Thomas" == Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thomas> there were claims on this mailing list that 2.50 was 3 times > Thomas> faster than 2.13 (so you're saying that 2.52x is ~60 times > Thomas> slower than 2.50) > > Wow! That's quite impre

Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --

2001-10-31 Thread Paul Eggert
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 05:30:41 -0500 > From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I just upgraded from autoconf-2.13 to autoconf-2.52 and either I > > > have done something incredibly stupid (an always present > > > possibility) or the 2.52 version does its thing extremely slowly. > > > >

Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --

2001-10-31 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 06:23:46AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > On 31 Oct 2001, Akim Demaille wrote: > > > > "Thomas" == Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Thomas> there were claims on this mailing list that 2.50 was 3 times > > Thomas> faster than 2.13 (so you're saying th

toner cartridges

2001-10-31 Thread supply
VORTEX SUPPLIES YOUR LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGE, COPIER AND FAX CARTRIDGE CONNECTION SAVE UP TO 30% FROM RETAIL ORDER BY PHONE:1-888-288-9043 ORDER BY FAX: 1-888-977-1577 E-MAIL REMOVAL LINE: 1-888-248-4930 UNIVERSITY AND/OR SCHOOL PURCHASE ORDERS WELCOME. (NO CREDIT APPROVAL