[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I have switched to the latest autoconf snapshot (2.52e, cvs-updated today)
> > and have tried hard to follow all the instructions for the upgrade.
> > I believe I am no longer u
> "Charlotte" == Charlotte Pettis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charlotte> List, I have tried to configure autoconf for the Unix
Charlotte> subsystem Interix with no luck. Is there anyone who uses
Charlotte> OpenNt by SoftwaySystems and actually configured autoconf
Charlotte> correctly? Any a
> "Chris" == Chris Seawood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> Hi, I'm the build maintainer for Mozilla.
Hi!
Chris> This is partially understandable as we do some bad things like
Chris> calling AC_OUTPUT_SUBDIRS manually so that we can add options
Chris> to subconfigures.
Yeah, that's ba
Did you realize that you can earn your legimate BA, MA or PhD degree using the your
existing work experience and/or your academic experience?
If you are a high school graduate with a minimum of 4 years work experience in a
particular field, YOU CAN QUALIFY.
FOR MORE INFORMATION SEND US A R
> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> But then, I wonder why you bother to `smash' anyway?
Because I frequently read configure, and I like to have it readable.
My Autoconf programming style is also based on the hypothetic idea
that some day M4 could be able to expand
> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> As far as shell functions are concerned, it seems to me that
Gary> m4sh could provide shell function wrapper macros which expand to
Gary> a function/function call if that is supported by the shell, or
Gary> else an inline function i
How about going for a release? Is there any *new* problem since 2.52?
Is there anything we should put into CVS before moving to a beta,
then, hopefully, a release?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:00:52PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gary> But then, I wonder why you bother to `smash' anyway?
>
> Because I frequently read configure, and I like to have it readable.
> My Autoconf programming style is
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:00:38PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gary> As far as shell functions are concerned, it seems to me that
> Gary> m4sh could provide shell function wrapper macros which expand to
> Gary> a function/function c
> From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 19 Oct 2001 18:50:14 +0200
>
> How about going for a release? Is there any *new* problem since 2.52?
I suspect there will be some problems due to all the changes/bugfixes
introduced since 2.52. I'm worried about the LINENO / exec-bash
stuff, fo
Hi,
I maintain the ORBit packages for the Debian project. (ORBit is the
CORBA component of GNOME). And I have a feature request for
autoconf. I'm not an autoconf guru, so please bear with me.
Basically, ORBit contains a library for parsing IDL (Interface
Definition Language) files. These fil
> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > it is probably still worth mentioning in the autoconf manual's
>> > section on portable shell programming.
>>
>> Yes, that makes sense.
Tim> I'll whip up something tomorrow.
Hi Tim! ;)
> >> > it is probably still worth mentioning in the autoconf manual's
> >> > section on portable shell programming.
> >>
> >> Yes, that makes sense.
>
> Tim> I'll whip up something tomorrow.
>
> Hi Tim! ;)
Hi Akim!
As you well know, time is a relative concept (in fact, to me it's
yesterday at
13 matches
Mail list logo
