> Come to think of it, why do we need PATH_SEPARATOR at all? At the
> early stage, when we are detecting what kind of shell we're using, we
> can transliterate ";" to ":" if we discover we are in a DOS
> environment. Then we don't need to use PATH_SEPARATOR at all, except
> in one little bit of
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 05:40:00PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 04 Oct 2001 17:39:04 +0200
> >
> > I also forgot to say that your code could use happily AS_PATH_WALK.
>
> OK, here's a revised patch that takes all your suggestions into
> account.
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 10:53:04AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I understand that was probably a design decision, a feature rather than a
> > bug, but I don't quite get the reasoning behind this decision.
>
> I have only dipped my toes into autoconf myself so don't take anything
> I say as autho
> > The new version of the docs or the code or both have apparently been
> > updated. Your version might be documented accurately. Here is what the
> > say now.
[...]
> What's the difference with the 2.13 docs ??
You are right, it is not different. I read the 2.13 docs wrong.
> > If automake
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 01:36:12PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > AC_CHECK_PROGS(YACC,byacc yacc 'bison -y',[${am_missing_run} yacc])
> >
> > Looks like a nice quick fix but this doesn't seem to work with autoconf 2.13
> > :-(. The generated configure script reports that bison, byacc, yacc
> >
> Aaah OK, now I understand. I haven't used those beasts (lex/yacc) for a long
> time and had forgotten about this feature. I came across this while
> attempting to build a package ; the package doesn't distribute the generated
> files, but instead attempts to build them at compile time. It's the
> From: "Tim Van Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 12:13:29 +0200
>
> The whole problem with ':' is that it is the drive separator on DOS.
> Otherwise, transliterating ':' to ';' would indeed be a much cleaner
> method.
So, what you're saying is that DOS shells do not conform t
ű׸¦ Á¦°øÇÑ
ÀÚ¹Ù¹æ º£³Ê¿¹¿ä.
¼Ò½ºº¸±â.txt (4KB)
¿À´ÃÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ(ÅõÇ¥ÇÏ¸é °á°ú¸¦ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.)
À¯Ä¡ÇÏ´Ù..
¾µ¸¸ÇÏ´Ù..
¡çÁñ°Å¿î ÆíÁö
> > > I probably need to upgrade, as I have found no mention of
> > > am_missing_run on the files owned by my current autoconf package,
> > > whereas it is defined in m4/missing.m4 in autoconf 2.52.
> >
> > I can't say as I found it in any documentation. I pulled it out of
> > other examples of
