Re: [f77] Disable C comments in config.h

2001-09-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Denis" == Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Denis> Hi, AIX Fortran compiler dislikes C comments in config.h; it Denis> would be nice to have a macro to disable such comments (i mean Denis> a documented macro ;)), :) :) :) Denis> or maybe check for this feature in AC_PROG_F77 and

include already set in CXXCPPFLAGS ?

2001-09-03 Thread Genty Jean-Paul
Hi I submit this question for CXXCPPFLAGS, but it could be for any string. In a m4 macro file, is there a simple trick to detect if '-I/usr/local/include' is already set ? Thanks Genty Jean-Paul

Re: [f77] Disable C comments in config.h

2001-09-03 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 09:55:34AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: [...] > Denis> Hi, AIX Fortran compiler dislikes C comments in config.h; it > Denis> would be nice to have a macro to disable such comments (i mean > Denis> a documented macro ;)), [...] > Anyway, back to this issue: what do you mean

Re: Configure.in migration facility

2001-09-03 Thread John Poltorak
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:22:05PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: > > "John" == John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > To avoid needing two versions of Autoconf installed, is there anything > > like a migration facility which would convert old configure.in files to a > > format su

Re: include already set in CXXCPPFLAGS ?

2001-09-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Genty Jean-Paul writes: > I submit this question for CXXCPPFLAGS, but it could be for any string. > > In a m4 macro file, is there a simple trick to detect if > '-I/usr/local/include' is already set ? case " $CXXCPPFLAGS " in *" -I/usr/local/include "*) ;; # already set *) CXXCPPFLAGS="-

Re: Configure.in migration facility

2001-09-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "John" == John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Any ideas about what is missing? New Macros -- Because Autoconf has been dormant for years, Automake provided Autoconf-like macros for a while. Autoconf 2.50 now provides better versions of these macros, integrated in t

Re: Configure.in migration facility

2001-09-03 Thread Tim Van Holder
On 03 Sep 2001 11:04:37 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:22:05PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: > > > "John" == John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > To avoid needing two versions of Autoconf installed, is there anything > > > like a migration facility

Re: Configure.in migration facility

2001-09-03 Thread John Poltorak
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 01:17:30PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote: > On 03 Sep 2001 11:04:37 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:22:05PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: > > > > "John" == John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > To avoid needing two versions

Re: Configure.in migration facility

2001-09-03 Thread Tim Van Holder
> The most recent version available to me is 1.4-p4. Is there any chance of > this working? Is there anything like a 'success' msg to look out for? I think 1.4-p4 should do fine. An easy way to check is to do a grep AC_DEFUN on automake's .m4 files; if they look like AC_DEFUN([blah],...

Wall Street in Encino !!! Free Direct Execution Seminar

2001-09-03 Thread root
Attend a FREE On-Site Trading, Inc. Seminar in Encino. 16030 Ventura Blvd. Suite 605 Encino, CA 91346 Tel: (818)325-3939 Seating is limited Please call to confirm your attendance Whether you are a novice or an advanced trader, now you can have the most comprehensive and professional lea