Greetings, autoconfers,
I maintain a project which has, so far, used autoconf 2.1x. I user
recentlyreported that with 2.52 he gets the following errors:
configure.in:245: error: m4_popdef: undefined macro:
AC_Dest
acgeneral.m4:3399: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
configure.in:245: the t
> "Stephan" == Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephan> Are there documents explaining what needs to be done to make
Stephan> older configure.ins work with AC 2.5x? I've checked out the
Stephan> manual on the GNU site and it's dated 1998 and covers 2.13,
Stephan> so little luck there
| Hello again!
| On 22 Aug 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
| >| The installation is performed by:
| >|
| >| make install \
| >| prefix=/home/cfd1/stow/autoconf-2.52b \
| >| exec_prefix=/home/cfd1/alphaev67-dec-osf4.0f/stow/autoconf-2.52b
| >
| >Arg... That might be the problem. And maybe not.
| >
| On 21 Aug 2001 17:22:56 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| >
| > autom4te --mode=autoconf some-weird-input-name.yy -o configure
|
| I'd recommend this for all uses, actually (much like libtool).
| I'm not entirely sure I like the globbing approach, though, as it starts
| to unnecessarily r
> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So we are looking for specially non special characters. @__@?
Paul> Any repeated character will make the string more likely.
Paul> How about @&t@? That would be easy to remember as expanding to
Paul> the empty string, as the mnemonic w
> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So we are looking for specially non special characters. @__@?
Paul> Any repeated character will make the string more likely.
Paul> How about @&t@? That would be easy to remember as expanding to
Paul> the empty string, as the mnemonic w
Hello!
On 27 Aug 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
>| >Could I ask you to first perform an in-place build? Then we'll se.
>| >
>| >Just a plain ./configure && make check.
>|
>| Well, I had to install, too, as autoconf will look for Autom4te/General.pm in
>| /usr/local/share/autoconf in vain, otherwise
> From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 27 Aug 2001 13:23:47 +0200
>
> & is special: I've been bitten by this AWK program:
>
> gsub ("@comment.*", "@&t@", line);
>
> which of course had the result of prefixing with @, suffixing with &@.
> I backlashed it and it works, but do we