Problems with KDE cvs auto* scripts

Hi, I have problems with the KDE makefile cvs creation process. A bit of backgroud: KDE uses a common "admin" dir with standardized scripts and macro to create Makefile for all the various modules and their subdirs. Those scripts are called from a Makefile.common that creates (merging similar

Re: Problems with KDE cvs auto* scripts

> Autoconf complains: > ./aclocal.m4:2508: error: m4_defn: undefined macro: _m4_divert_diversion > acfunctions.m4:1108: AM_FUNC_OBSTACK is expanded from... > ./aclocal.m4:2508: the top level > > in aclocal.m4 > AC_DEFUN(AM_FUNC_OBSTACK, This should be "AC_DEFUN([AM_FUNC_OBSTACK]," - autoconf it

Re: "times" ?!

Tim Van Holder wrote: > > > For some reason, the generated tests/testsuite contains > > times >at-times > > all over the place. What is "times"? I can't find it, and it isn't a > > /bin/sh builtin.. > > I think it's a bash builtin which reports the elapsed time > of all processes in the curr

passing configure options via AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS

I have a configure.ac in which I conditionally configure additional sources that have their own ./configure scripts. Using AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS works great. But, now I'd like to pass some configure options that I don't use in my top-level configure. How can I pass these to the individual configure

Cut Your Bills In Half

Title: Having problems paying your Bills? Having problems paying your Bills? We can help! We Negotiate Debt! Are You Up To Your Ears In Credit Card Debt? Do You Have Little (If Any) Money Left After Paying Bills? We can help you get from RED to BLACK! Our Professionals Have:

Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch)

It's currently 226 lines, 1366 words, and 9221 bytes. At that size, it may as well have a simple permissive license, as you suggested. However, the wording should be different: Copying and distribution of verbatim and modified versions of this file is permitted in any medium provide

Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch)

> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:17:49 -0600 (MDT) > From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > At that size, it may as well have a simple permissive license, as you > suggested. However, the wording should be different: OK, here's a revised patch to 'autoconf' that uses the different wording. I

'make-stds.texi' copyright notice (needed for autoconf, make)

> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:17:49 -0600 (MDT) > From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > As for make-stds.texi, we probably want that to be under the GFDL > alone. OK, here is a proposed patch to do that. I got the copyright dates by inspecting the gnu.org history for make-stds.texi and ma

freshmeat project listing for Autoconf

I'm writing in reference to your project "Autoconf". Since the time you submitted this project to us, freshmeat has adopted a new categorization system which allows much more fine-grained organization of projects. Since your project has never been recategorized under this system, our readers are

Re: 'make-stds.texi' copyright notice (needed for autoconf, make)

%% Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: pe> I will CC: this message to the GNU make maintainer as a reminder pe> that the GNU 'make' documentation also needs to be put under the pe> GFDL. I've already done this as per a message RMS sent out a few months ago. Not in CVS yet, I know :(.