On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 07:40:38PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> I've just uploaded Autoconf 2.52b (for Autoconf 2.52a was broken, of
> course...).
[...]
> Basically you can consider 2.52b is nothing but 2.52 atop autom4te.
> But it requires extensive testing (aka, ``use it at your own risks''
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 02:59:53PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> In autoconf-2.13, shift was explicitly undefined in acgeneral.m4.
> In 2.50 it seems to be renamed to m4_shift, and there is also
> m4_shiftn in m4sh.m4. However, I can't seem to be able to use
> either of these macros myself:
>
> AC
In autoconf-2.13, shift was explicitly undefined in acgeneral.m4.
In 2.50 it seems to be renamed to m4_shift, and there is also
m4_shiftn in m4sh.m4. However, I can't seem to be able to use
either of these macros myself:
AC_DEFUN([AC_CONFIG_LIBCONFIG_MODULES],
ifelse([$1], , ,
[AC_CONFIG_LIBCONF
> "Andy" == Andy Goth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There are two issues dealing with subtleties of make semantics that
>> I would appreciate help and/or suggestions in fixing. They are with
>> program-generated code and with fragility during cleaning.
Andy> One problem I have is that I mus
On Thursday, August 2, 2001 9:27, Scott A Crosby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I read the ``Recursive Make Considered harmful'' paper[1] about a year ago.
Just an interjection...
I found a minor problem in depend.sh (or in gcc, depending on how you look at
it) with subdirectories. But I fixed it with mo
> "Scott" == Scott A Crosby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Scott> First, 'make clean' builds dependencies before doing any
Scott> cleaning.
This is a known flaw in the dependency tracking implementation
recommended by GNU make. You can read about this problem, and the
fix, in the Automake depe
