Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> I have attached a rewritten ac_path_generic.m4 (AM_PATH_LIB), as well
> as an updated AM_CONFIG_LIBCONFIG. If they are OK, I'm willing to
> submit them to the archive. Any comments appreciated.
Hi Roger,
it took me a bit to get time to have a look - AFAICS your macro a
Tom Tromey wrote:
> Lately I've been thinking about speeding up config.status,
> especially as regards automake.
>
> Right now each Makefile.in automake generates has *every*
> configure substitution in it. Why do all this work? For
> automake it would be better if config.status simply created
> The actual advantage of your macro comes of course with config.status
> updates - I hope that I can at one day turn my macro into a form that
> adds its -config file output-generation into config.status. IIRC the
> new autoconf does support some helper routines for exactly that purpose.
> But it
> "Vaclav" == Vaclav Barta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vaclav> OK, this may be a stupid question, but do all makes have include?
In our experience, most do. However, syntax differs. But we could
use inclusion by copying in those cases where make doesn't support
`include'. Using `cat' will
