Re: Autoconf 2.52 is released

2001-07-25 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:44:04PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:10:19 +0200 > > From: Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For me, it is subdir handling in autoconf-2.5x. > > I don't use that, so I had no problem. :-) > > > A further problem is some of the new

Re: Autoconf 2.52 is released

2001-07-25 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Paul Eggert wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:10:19 +0200 > > From: Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For me, it is subdir handling in autoconf-2.5x. > > I don't use that, so I had no problem. :-) We have a large number of optional architecture-dependent subdirectories and have be

RE: Autoconf 2.52 is released

2001-07-25 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Ralf Corsepius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:38 AM > To: Paul Eggert > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Autoconf 2.52 is released > > > Paul Eggert wrote: > > > > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:10:19 +0200

Stripping newline in autom4te

2001-07-25 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! I have figured out why autoconf stopped working for me. I'm using mktemp that supports `-d', but it outputs a newline after the directory name. It's mktemp-1.5-8 from RedHat 7.1. Using "chomp" on the output fixes the problem. Changelog: * autom4te.in (mktmpdir): Strip trailing n

Re: Stripping newline in autom4te

2001-07-25 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Pavel> Hello! I have figured out why autoconf stopped working for me. Pavel> I'm using mktemp that supports `-d', but it outputs a newline Pavel> after the directory name. It's mktemp-1.5-8 from RedHat 7.1. Pavel> Using "chomp" on the o

Re: (wishlist) Automated lib-config script generation

2001-07-25 Thread Roger Leigh
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:01:02AM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote: > > Tim Van Holder wrote: > > > > > Nowadays, many shared libraries include a -config script e.g. libgtk > > > [...] > > > There is much duplication of code here. Anyone wishing to use this > > > scheme must duplicate the script and