Re: Fortran name-mangling scheme fails on HP-UX 11.11

2001-06-29 Thread John W. Eaton
On 28-Jun-2001, Steven G. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Denis Barbier wrote: | > But there is no reason for AC_F77_WRAPPERS to require | > AC_F77_LIBRARY_LDFLAGS; in _AC_F77_NAME_MANGLING one may simply (well, | > i have no idea whether this is simple or not) link agai

Re: Fortran name-mangling scheme fails on HP-UX 11.11

2001-06-29 Thread Steven G. Johnson
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, John W. Eaton wrote: > On 28-Jun-2001, Steven G. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Well, then you have the opposite problem: figuring out whether there are > | any special flags or libraries that you need to pass to the Fortran > | linker in order to link to C programs.

Re: Fortran name-mangling scheme fails on HP-UX 11.11

2001-06-29 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:44:23AM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote: > On 28-Jun-2001, Steven G. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Denis Barbier wrote: > | > But there is no reason for AC_F77_WRAPPERS to require > | > AC_F77_LIBRARY_LDFLAGS; in _AC_F77_NAME_MANGLING one may

Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE macro

2001-06-29 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:58:35 +0400 > > It checks only for specific option for IRIX and _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and > _LARGE_FILES macros. That is not enough; e.g. on our system: > > bor@itsrm2% getconf LFS_CFLAGS > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LONGLONG