On 8 Jun 2001, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2001, Stephen L Moshier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The libobjc/configure script in the cvs archive is not the same as
> > the one that gets generated during the build. For some reason make
> > insists on running autoconf, which generate
Would y'all consider extending the license exception to include the
'missing' script as well? (I'm referring to the exception that allows
distributing autoconf support files with apps that are not gpld. I'm not
sure if there are other support files that are gpl'd, but the same request
would apply
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:09:35AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > The libobjc/configure script in the cvs archive is not the same as
[...]
> The blank line contains AC_EXEEXT in configure.in. Since AC_EXEEXT is
> run by default by default by autoconf 2.50, the duplicate expands to
> nothing, w
