Re: AmigaOS fork()

2001-05-24 Thread Lars Hecking
> vfork() is normally a very different function than fork(), with > significantly different and much more dangerous behavior if it is not > immediately followed by an exec(). Is that the case on Amiga, or is it > just a misnamed fork()? AmigaOS cannot have fork() due to lack of virtual memory

Re: AmigaOS fork()

2001-05-24 Thread Tim Van Holder
> +/* On AmigaOS, fork() isn't implemented due to missing MP. */ > +int main () > +{ > + if (fork() < 0) > +exit (1); > + exit (0); > +}], > +[ac_cv_func_fork_works=yes], > +[ac_cv_func_fork_works=no], > +[AC_CHECK_FUNC(fork) > +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_

Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork()

2001-05-24 Thread Rüdiger Kuhlmann
>--[Tim Van Holder]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For the cross-compiling case, I think Okay, what about this: It doesn't #define fork anymore, but HAVE_FORK if it works. Then the program has to check this itself. 2001-05-24 Rüdiger Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * acfunctions.m4: (AC_FUNC_FOR

Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder

2001-05-24 Thread Axel Thimm
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:46:49AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2001, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > may be there are some hints whether people have already tried with > > > borland compilers. > > Let's hope they are reading this list and will step forward to discuss it ;) > sure - B

Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder

2001-05-24 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:43:59PM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote: > I would recommended to use atleast gmake and (ba)sh which are both available > for win/dos, and having the complete gnu fileutils is not a bad idea either. Yes, as a first step I was considering cygwin as a solid basis for sh/perl e

Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork()

2001-05-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Rüdiger Kuhlmann writes: > Okay, what about this: It doesn't #define fork anymore, but HAVE_FORK if it > works. Then the program has to check this itself. > > 2001-05-24 Rüdiger Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * acfunctions.m4: (AC_FUNC_FORK) New, check whether fork() isn't just >

Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder

2001-05-24 Thread Mike Castle
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Mike Castle writes: > > How do you reference the generated make file? > > include $(top_builddir)/Makefile.global > > This requires that you set top_builddir somewhere. Well, that's the magic I was wondering about. :-> What i

cd

2001-05-24 Thread hhjb133
¿©·¯ºÐ¿¡°Ô °¡Àå ÇÊ¿äÇϰí À¯ÀÍÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÆÄ°ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ½Ñ °¡°Ý¿¡ °ø±ÞÇÕ´Ï´Ù ÃֽŰÔÀÓ. À¯Æ¿°ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥. MP3. ºñµð¿À½Ãµð µîµî ¸ðµç ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÆÇ¸ÅÇÕ´Ï´Ù. 5¿ù ÃֽŸ®½ºÆ®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¹°·Ð ½Å¿ë °ÆÁ¤À» ÀüÇô ½Å°æ¾²Áö ¸¶½Ê½Ã¿ä ¾ÐÃàÈ­ÀϼÓÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» º¸½ÅÈÄ ÀüÈ­³ª ¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽʽÿä ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³½ ¾Æ

Re: how to use libraries in /usr/local

2001-05-24 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Russ Allbery writes: > What I'd love to see is a way to pass the configure script a whole > list of directories into which software may be installed, not just > /usr/local and /usr/pubsw but also /usr/pubsw/apps/db3 and > /usr/pubsw/apps/openssl and other directories that have a lib and > include

Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder

2001-05-24 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Mike Castle wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Mike Castle writes: > > > How do you reference the generated make file? > > > > include $(top_builddir)/Makefile.global > > > > This requires that you set top_builddir somewhere. > > Well, that's the mag

Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork()

2001-05-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The key question here is, if a program requires fork(), would it > normally work with Amiga's vfork()? My guess is no, so this patch would > not be correct. I like the idea of testing for fork() and making sure it works. The only part I disagree w

Re: how to use libraries in /usr/local

2001-05-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Steven G Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's wrong with just doing: > ./configure LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/pubsw/lib" > CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/pubsw/include" See my followup message. That doesn't take care of shared libraries across multiple platforms, for one.

Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder

2001-05-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Mike Castle writes: > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Mike Castle writes: > > > How do you reference the generated make file? > > > > include $(top_builddir)/Makefile.global > > > > This requires that you set top_builddir somewhere. > > Well, that's the magic

Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder

2001-05-24 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Axel Thimm wrote: > > [...] may be there are some hints whether people have already tried with > > borland compilers. > > Let's hope they are reading this list and will step forward to discuss it ;) sure - Borland C is much faster, and checks for errors that gcc doesn't both

Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder

2001-05-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Mike Castle writes: > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 02:08:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Make config.status put all the configuration information into a single > > makefile and have all the other makefiles include that one. It's saved me > > many boring waits. > > How do you reference the gen