> "Greg" == Greg A Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Sorry for `spamming' the whole list, but I really want this to be on
the public record:]
Greg> Meanwhile if someone tries to post a legitimate message from
Greg> a blocked site (eg. an open relay) then in reality none of
Greg>
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Apr 17, 2001, "Tim Van Holder"
Alexandre> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just a few caveats, and how the DJGPP differs from the 'official'
>> tree
Alexandre> Any reason why these shouldn't be part of the autoconf
Alexa
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:50:06AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
: On Apr 17, 2001, "Tim Van Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Just a few caveats, and how the DJGPP differs from the 'official'
: > tree
:
: Any reason why these shouldn't be part of the autoconf manual? It
: feels like this i
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:50:41PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
: Akim Demaille wrote:
: > The thing is, we have already done this. No real patch gets in.
: > Nobody complains about the betas. And no one use them. Let's face
: > it, the only means to have feedback on Autoconf is to release it and
> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Ok, I changed AC_CANNONICAL_HOST to AC_CANNONICAL_SYSTEM in
Robert> configure.ac and it works. However, this doesn't appear to be
Robert> the 'proper' fix because AC_CANNONICAL_SYSTEM is obsolete. I
Robert> also have tried AC_C
> : Any reason why these shouldn't be part of the autoconf manual? It
> : feels like this is the right place for this kind of information?
>
> I have that feeling too.
Generally, I'd agree.
However,
a) Most, if not all, DJGPP packages come with a DJGPP-specific readme
that identifies the p
