> -Original Message-
> From: John Poltorak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 12:49 AM
> To: Autoconf List
> Subject: Autoconf 2.49d test: Command not found
>
>
> After setting a number of environment variables and running
> sh ./configure
> followed by make I
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:48:41PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> After setting a number of environment variables and running
> sh ./configure
> followed by make I got the following error at the end:-
...
> Making all in doc
> make[1]: Entering directory `/eval/autoconf-2.49d/doc'
> make[1]: :: Co
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:36:48AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:48:41PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> > After setting a number of environment variables and running
> > sh ./configure
> > followed by make I got the following error at the end:-
> ...
> > Making all in do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a problem with autoconf 2.49d. I tried to configure the GNU
CommonC++ package and I got this output. This didn't happen with 2.13 that
is installed here by default. The system is FreeBSD 3.5-STABLE,
SHELL=/usr/local/bin/tcsh.
Vaclav Hais
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:11:24PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> > > After setting a number of environment variables and running
> > > sh ./configure
> > > followed by make I got the following error at the end:-
> > ...
> > > Making all in doc
> > > make[1]: Entering directory `/eval/autoconf-2.4
John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> On further investigation, it seems to be coming from here:-
>
>
> $(srcdir)/version.texi: stamp-vti
> @:
>
> My Make struggles to understand '@:'.
That's bad. It's an oft-used idiom.
> What is it supposed to mean?
"Quietly do nothin
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:20:02PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
: On further investigation, it seems to be coming from here:-
:
: $(srcdir)/version.texi: stamp-vti
: @:
:
: My Make struggles to understand '@:'.
:
: What is it supposed to mean?
@ tags the make rule so that make doesn't di
%% Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rrh> John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rrh> [snip]
>> On further investigation, it seems to be coming from here:-
>>
>>
>> $(srcdir)/version.texi: stamp-vti
>> @:
>>
>> My Make struggles to understand '@:'.
rrh> That
%% John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jp> It's a version of GNU Make ported to OS/2.
This is a bug in that version of GNU make, or in the port to OS/2 (not
sure). If you have the source code, you want to do this:
Edit the file job.c.
Find the function construct_command_argv_internal(
Hi,
"Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:20:02PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> : On further investigation, it seems to be coming from here:-
> :
> : $(srcdir)/version.texi: stamp-vti
> : @:
> :
> : My Make struggles to understand '@:'.
> :
> : What is it
> "Vaclav" == Vaclav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vaclav> Hi,
Vaclav> I have a problem with autoconf 2.49d. I tried to configure the
Vaclav> GNU CommonC++ package and I got this output. This didn't
Vaclav> happen with 2.13 that is installed here by default. The system
Vaclav> is FreeB
| N:\eval\autoconf-2.49d>make -v
| GNU Make version 3.76.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
| Copyright (C) 1988, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97
|
| > This definitely works in the versions of GNU make I have access to.
|
| It's a version of GNU Make ported to OS/2.
Please, when yo
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 03:32:09PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
: N:\eval\autoconf-2.49d>make -v
: GNU Make version 3.76.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
: Copyright (C) 1988, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97
:
: > This definitely works in the versions of GNU make I have access to.
:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:13:52AM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> rrh> John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> rrh> [snip]
> >> On further investigation, it seems to be coming from here:-
> >>
> >>
> >> $(srcdir)/version.texi: s
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:03:09PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> | N:\eval\autoconf-2.49d>make -v
> | GNU Make version 3.76.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
> | Copyright (C) 1988, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97
> |
> | > This definitely works in the versions of GNU make I have
> I've tried it under PDKSH, BASH and CMD.EXE. The results are the same
> under each.
>
> > Does `:' work properly on your shell?
>
> When running:-
>
> sh -c :
>
> there is no response, which I guess is what you would expect.
>
If you mean you tried:
$ cmd
c:\> make
and
$ pdksh
$ make
th
%% "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
lja> Well, it's the shell that reports command not found, not make.
Normally true, but GNU make has an efficiency enhancement where it
examines the command line to be run for various special characters and
commands. If any of those are found, it in
Requested files are attached.
Vaclav Haisman
On 21 Mar 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Vaclav" == Vaclav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Vaclav> Hi,
>
> Vaclav> I have a problem with autoconf 2.49d. I tried to configure the
> Vaclav> GNU CommonC++ package and I got this output.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:56:26AM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> jp> It's a version of GNU Make ported to OS/2.
>
> This is a bug in that version of GNU make, or in the port to OS/2 (not
> sure). If you have the source code, you want to do this
How can I prevent the macros PACKAGE and VERSION from beinng #define'd
in my config.h? As I understand it, it is autoheader that generates
the config.h.in from configure.in -- is there a way to prevent this
via autoheader, or do I have to munge the config.h.in after autoheader
makes it?
Jeremy
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
