Re: Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-05 Thread Akim Demaille
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I prefer not to post messages without full understanding of the problem, > but since you may release 2.49d at any time I want to warn you not to do > so. :) You are right :) > However, pdksh-5.2.14 cannot run the testsuite. It hangs before doing > any

Re: Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-05 Thread Akim Demaille
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've done some search in CVS history. The problem was introduced by the > following change (committed 2000/11/23 09:47:45) Did you do this by hand? > Now to the "warning" problem. > > > : warning: improperly designed, please report to > > : warning:

Re: bug in autoconf deb v 2.13-25?

2001-03-05 Thread Akim Demaille
Thanks, fixed in CVS Autoconf.

Re: Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-05 Thread Akim Demaille
Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * tests/atgeneral.m4 (AT_INIT): Register at-setup-line and at-check-line for removal. Check for the presence of at-check-line only when $at_test was really a test. Reported by Pavel. Index: tests/a

Re: Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Akim! > * tests/atgeneral.m4 (AT_INIT): Register at-setup-line and > at-check-line for removal. > Check for the presence of at-check-line only when $at_test was > really a test. > Reported by Pavel. Thanks! Go ahead. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
> > I've done some search in CVS history. The problem was introduced by the > > following change (committed 2000/11/23 09:47:45) > > Did you do this by hand? Shame on me, it wasn't a full-blown script. I used to have an iterator for CVS, but I lost it since then. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Rename atomicity

2001-03-05 Thread Mike Castle
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 06:32:25AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > Do you know of a system on which such a use of rename is _not_ atomic? NT. (NT will happily rename() across disks, hardly an atomic operation). Some earlier implementations of Linux. I believe some implementations of Solaris (for

Autoconf complaining about bug

2001-03-05 Thread Everton da Silva Marques
Hello. When I added AC_CANONICAL_HOST to acinclude.m4, autoconf started to complain about some bugs, as shown at the end of this message. SYSTEM: Package: autoconf 2.13 OS: Debian 2.2 (Linux 2.2.17) Arch: i386 I'm not sure what else is needed to catch this problem, so please feel free to guide

How do I build debug versions?

2001-03-05 Thread Shameek Basu
Hi,     I am a newbie to the autotools, and needed some help with a project I am working on.       I want to be able to generate a Makefile that takes some command line params and accordingly sets or does not set the "-g", "-O" etc flags. I don't want them to be parameters to the configure s