Tim Van Holder wrote:
> >> >* remake-hdr.am (@STAMP@): Use .T as suffix for the
> >> >temporary file.
> >>
> >> You should probably patch autoconf's autoreconf too.
> >
> > > What part would need patching?
> >
> > The one that choose stamp file names like those created by automake.
>
> Ri
> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tim> a) how likely is it that tcount becomes 10 or more?
Very unlikely.
Tim> b) what impact does using a different name (e.g. st-h-$stamp.in)
Tim> have?
Probably none. Unless of course somebody is relying on the names and
we don't k
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:42:18AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> In the recent namespace conversation we didn't mention macros like
> >> `AM_CFLAGS'. This is an automake-specific macro which the user is
> >> allowed to set.
>
PLEASE FORWARD TO THE PERSON
RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING
YOUR LASER PRINTER SUPPLIES
VORTEX SUPPLIES
-SPECIALS OF THE DAY ON LASER TONER SUPPLIES AT DISCOUNT PRICES--
LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES
COPIER AND FAX CARTRIDGES
WE ARE -->THE<-- PLACE TO BUY YOUR TONER CARTRIDG
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 04:35:08PM +0100, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> > Does AUTOCONF provide support for DOS pathnames? ie drive letters,
> > '\' in directories and ';' as separators in paths?
> It's starting to. The current CVS autoconf has had several patches
> applied for better DOS support. It'
On Feb 12, 2001, Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I thought that it was a simple bug: the aclocal regexp was not
> taking into account the possibility of assigning to a variable name
> starting with "AM_".
You shouldn't assign to these variables. These are for *users* to
override,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:14:31AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2001, Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And I thought that it was a simple bug: the aclocal regexp was not
> > taking into account the possibility of assigning to a variable name
> > starting with "AM_".
>
On Feb 13, 2001, Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My recollection of that discussion was just the opposite: the user
> gets to set CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, and the like, while the software author
> gets to set AM_-versions of them.
I stand corrected. I have always got these reversed :-(
I su
