On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Can anyone comment on ACX_PTHREAD?
>
> rssh wrote:
> > It does not work good with solaris and freebsd.
>
> When you have a bug report, contacting the author is generally a good
> idea...
>
Oh, sorr
> No, it means you cannot expect AC_MSG_CHECKING to keep on working
> after having changed the quotes. Get rid of changequote. If you need
> some help, post the snippet.
Since I totally fail to work around, I would really appreciate some help.
This is how the original (before I started to work
> No, it means you cannot expect AC_MSG_CHECKING to keep on working
> after having changed the quotes. Get rid of changequote. If you need
> some help, post the snippet.
Since I totally fail to work around, I would really appreciate some help.
This is how the original (before I started to wor
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:54:19PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
:
: > No, it means you cannot expect AC_MSG_CHECKING to keep on working
: > after having changed the quotes. Get rid of changequote. If you need
: > some help, post the snippet.
:
: Since I totally fail to work around, I would real
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Can't m4sugar's `m4_noquote' macro be used?
Nope, inside the macro we really need the quote, but the argument he
wants to give to AC_CACHE_VAL is not balanced => what would you give
to m4_noquote? An unbalanced argument, the very same
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 02:05:51PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
: > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Lars> Can't m4sugar's `m4_noquote' macro be used?
:
: Nope, inside the macro we really need the quote, but the argument he
: wants to give to AC_CACHE_VAL is not balanced =
> # We need balanced brackets: [
That solution works, but is darn ugly to have to use.
/Mirar
> "Mirar" == Mirar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> # We need balanced brackets: [
Mirar> That solution works, but is darn ugly to have to use.
So use @>:@.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mirar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 6:21 PM
> To: Autoconf List
> Subject: changequote
>
>
> I have some problems with a newer autoconf,
> I have some code (I'm not the author) that looks like
>
> changequote({,})dnl
>
AC_ARG_WITH(mmalloc,
[ --with-mmalloc Use memory mapped malloc package],
[case "${withval}" in
yes) want_mmalloc=true ;;
no) want_mmalloc=false;;
*)AC_MSG_ERROR(bad value ${withval} for GDB with-mmalloc option)
;;
esac],[want_mmalloc=false])dnl
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Mirar" == Mirar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> # We need balanced brackets: [
> Mirar> That solution works, but is darn ugly to have to use.
>
> So use @>:@.
Does that work in older autoconfs? My problem is that it's a big team
of develop
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>-pthread -- is for gcc
Support for -pthread in gcc is non-standard. It is not supported by
the standard GNU compiler (e.g. 2.95.2) when configured and compiled
from distributed sources.
The portable way to support POSIX threads for SunOS 5.6
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >-pthread -- is for gcc
>
> Support for -pthread in gcc is non-standard. It is not supported by
> the standard GNU compiler (e.g. 2.95.2) when configured and compiled
> from distributed sources.
>
1. For Sun So
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Ruslan Shevchenko wrote:
>
> Below is Sun docs, which fully describe compiling multithreading
> programs with Sun CC .
>
> Note, that using -mt for C++ programs is still nesessorry.
That is interesting since most of my Solaris threads experience is
with using C++, and we di
Mirar writes:
> Does that work in older autoconfs? My problem is that it's a big team
> of developers with different versions of autoconf (from the oldest
> possible to the newest from CVS).
Standardize on one (say, 2.13) and check the resulting configure script
into your revision control system
> -Original Message-
> From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 4:15 PM
> To: Bernard Dautrevaux
> Cc: 'Mirar'; Autoconf List
> Subject: Re: changequote
>
>
>
> AC_ARG_WITH(mmalloc,
> [ --with-mmalloc Use memory mapped malloc p
Does your stepfamily life resemble a soap opera more than it does the Brady
Bunch?
The Stepfamily Association of America invites you to participate in THE
NATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR STEPFAMILIES, Feb. 23-24, 2001, at the New Orleans
Marriott Hotel.
This is an opportunity, designed by knowledgeable
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > there now. I haven't heard of any problems on FreeBSD, and in fact I have
> > specifically tested it on FreeBSD systems in the past.
>
> We must add -pthread to complier flags there
Already done, although the macro prefers kernel threads (-kthre
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Support for -pthread in gcc is non-standard. It is not supported by
> the standard GNU compiler (e.g. 2.95.2) when configured and compiled
> from distributed sources.
Supposedly, the gcc flag on Solaris is -pthreads (note the plural),
although this i
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mirar writes:
>
> > Does that work in older autoconfs? My problem is that it's a big team
> > of developers with different versions of autoconf (from the oldest
> > possible to the newest from CVS).
>
> Standardize on one (say, 2.13) and check the
On Dec 20, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Everything configures and makes OK but when I try to do a make distcheck, I
> get the following error:
> configure: error: can not find install-sh or install.sh in config/ or
> ../config/
Did you arrange for these files to be included in the distribut
> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> -pthread -- is for gcc
> Support for -pthread in gcc is non-standard. It is not supported by
> the standard GNU compiler (e.g. 2.95.2) when configured and compiled
> from distributed
22 matches
Mail list logo
