Autoconf patch to fix config.status error

2000-05-05 Thread Michael Bletzinger
When running a configure.in script that has no AC_DEFINE calls the config.status script that is generated contains any empty if/then/fi structure which bash croaks on. This patch fixes the behavior. Michael diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 acgeneral.m4 --- acgeneral.m42000/04/14 21:12:02

Defining headers

2000-05-05 Thread R Leigh
Dear all, I apologise in advance if this message is sent to the wrong forum. I have been using the autoconf/make programs on Debian GNU/Linux for some months now and have found them to be very good. However, I have the following question: If I define more than one header with AC_CONFIG_HEADER, (

Re: Defining headers

2000-05-05 Thread Mo DeJong
I think you have run into a bug in autoheader. The problem seemes to be that a call to: AC_DEFINE(UNIX_FILE_SYSTEM) will not actually add the #define to config.h.in. I worked around this issue by always using 3 arguments to AC_DEFINE. AC_DEFINE(UNIX_FILE_SYSTEM,,[quick hack to use UNIX file sy

Re: Defining headers

2000-05-05 Thread R Leigh
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 02:34:03PM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote: > I think you have run into a bug in autoheader. The problem seemes > to be that a call to: > > AC_DEFINE(UNIX_FILE_SYSTEM) > > will not actually add the #define to config.h.in. > > I worked around this issue by always using 3 arguments

Re: Defining headers

2000-05-05 Thread Lars Hecking
Mo DeJong writes: > I think you have run into a bug in autoheader. The problem seemes > to be that a call to: There is no bug in autoheader. autoheader itself is a bloody bug, and I'm wondering whether it's been eliminated from the current cvs.

Target for libtool?

2000-05-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! The current Libtool from CVS (head version) fails when I run configure: ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify' It turns out that the following code from libtool.m4 is at fault: case "$target" in NONE) lt_target="$host" ;; *) lt_target="$target" ;; esac With the

Re: help2man

2000-05-05 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 04:13:09PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: >Hello! > >> Why not just include it in the CVS? It is really small. Anything that >> will make autoconf 2.14 easier to install is a good thing. >> >> help2man-1.020.tar.gz 32 k > >In fact, help2man itself is just 11493 butes lon