Re: [PATCH] miniscule documentation fix

2000-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Morten" == Morten Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Morten> An example from the AC_HELP_STRING doc was missing a Morten> parenthesis. Thanks, applied. Akim

Re: [PATCH] miniscule documentation fix

2000-04-03 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:15:46PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: : > "Morten" == Morten Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : Morten> An example from the AC_HELP_STRING doc was missing a : Morten> parenthesis. : : Thanks, applied. Without requesting a verbatim ChangeLog entry? That's got t

Re: Autoconf regex test

2000-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Geoff" == Geoff Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> But you can of course also write sh commands in your configure.in >> that compiles regex.c instead. Geoff> I think that's probably sufficient. If you mean compiling by hand, don't do that. Use AC_TRY_COMPILE, or AC_COMPILE_IFELSE

Re: [PATCH] miniscule documentation fix

2000-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Without requesting a verbatim ChangeLog entry? That's got to be Lars> the first ;) In fact I did not include one at all. May be I did something wrong? I couldn't find any usefulness to have the ChangeLog say something about this.

Re: [PATCH] miniscule documentation fix

2000-04-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 3, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact I did not include one at all. May be I did something wrong? Changes in comments and/or docs don't strictly require ChangeLog entries. It might have been nice to include one, since it was an external user that was kind enough t

Re: Autoconf regex test

2000-04-03 Thread Geoff Hutchison
At 1:44 PM +0200 4/3/00, Akim Demaille wrote: > > "Geoff" == Geoff Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> But you can of course also write sh commands in your configure.in > >> that compiles regex.c instead. > >Geoff> I think that's probably sufficient. > >If you mean compiling by han

Re: [PATCH] miniscule documentation fix

2000-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> It might have been nice to include one, since it was an Alexandre> external user that was kind enough to supply us with the Alexandre> fix, but we need not bother creating such ChangeLog entries Alexandre> ourselves. I s

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Bruce Korb
Akim Demaille wrote: > >> Is it working for you when you start from a clean just-checked-out > >> repository? > > Alexandre> Nope. The first problem is that autoconf needs itself to > Alexandre> bootstrap. > > Not really, the CVS repository contains the full tarball (with > configure, Makefile.

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Earnie Boyd
--- Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -8<- > > I just installed a cute hack in the AutoGen CVS :-) > I made an archive file named "configure" that contains > a shar archive of the generated files. It runs, recreating > the generated files, deletes itself and then runs autoconf.

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 06:57:33AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: : --- Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > I made an archive file named "configure" that contains : > a shar archive of the generated files. It runs, recreating : > the generated files, deletes itself and then runs autoconf. :

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Earnie Boyd
--- "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 06:57:33AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: > : --- Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : > I made an archive file named "configure" that contains > : > a shar archive of the generated files. It runs, recreating > : > the generat

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> CVS Autoconf sticks to Automake 1.4: that's why you find all Akim> those problems. Use 1.4 instead, that's the easier way out. Oops, now I remember you *should* use 1.4, otherwise, because we rely on something which has changed bet

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Erez" == Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Update: I managed to solve that problem by rerunning automake on >> the .am > files in the autoconf CVS repository. >> >> You must re-run aclocal before automake. Erez> Thanks. Erez> I still, however, seem to have a problem with make

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> On Apr 2, 2000, Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Have you tried to make dist in a a build dir that's not srcdir? Alexandre> A long time ago, I installed a patch in autoconf to make it Alexandre> work. I don't kn

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Bruce Korb
Earnie Boyd wrote: > > --- Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I made an archive file named "configure" that contains > > a shar archive of the generated files. It runs, recreating > > the generated files, deletes itself and then runs autoconf. >^^ NOT

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Bruce Korb
Earnie Boyd wrote: > > How about mv'ing itself out of the way (to configure.bak or something > > similar)? > > > > Can't do that either. A mv is a cp && rm. 1. It is only for developers 2 How about putting at the end: ( ( sleep 3 ; rm -f configure ; autoconf ) & ) exit 0 After 3 se

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 07:46:08AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: : --- "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > How about mv'ing itself out of the way (to configure.bak or something : > similar)? : : Can't do that either. A mv is a cp && rm. I thought it was a link() and an unlink(), but you're

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Earnie Boyd
--- "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 07:46:08AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: > : --- "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : > How about mv'ing itself out of the way (to configure.bak or something > : > similar)? > : > : Can't do that either. A mv is a cp && r

Re: automake --build-dir

2000-04-03 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 08:17:02AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: : Earnie Boyd wrote: : > > How about mv'ing itself out of the way (to configure.bak or something : > > similar)? : > > : > : > Can't do that either. A mv is a cp && rm. : : 1. It is only for developers : 2 How about putting at the e

Re: Autoconf security - AC_SYS_LONG_FILE_NAMES

2000-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russ> Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Moreover, there's another problem: any user may simply touch >> /tmp/conftest9012345 and cause autoconf to think long filenames are >> not supported, unless the user sets TMPDIR to someth

Re: Autoconf security - AC_SYS_LONG_FILE_NAMES

2000-04-03 Thread Russ Allbery
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would doing something like > tmp=/tmp/ac.${RANDOM-$$} > be good? The intend is to use the randomness some shell support, but is > it possible to imagine that the script is run by a nasty guy who > precisely set a well known value to RANDOM? > I supp