> "Juergen" == Juergen A Erhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> First of all, undocumented features can't be relied
Juergen> upon... if it's not documented, it might not exist in the
Juergen> next version.
I agree, it's just a matter of struggling with René if needed :)
Juergen> Now,
| Here is a recent copyright assignment that was just entered into
| copyright.list.
|
| Who is the autoconf maintainer(s) anyways? Should it just be listed
| as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? The line in our maintainers file is presently
| blank, and I don't remember what the situation is.
Maintainers
Well, I don't see a problem in having to add features to OpenBSD m4 to stay
in synch with what autoconf needs from gnu-m4.
As long as those features are not gratuitous, and just put there to annoy
me and make sure autoconf only works with gnu-m4, I won't complain too
much :)
I'll admit to not h
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:46:23PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
:
: | Here is a recent copyright assignment that was just entered into
: | copyright.list.
: |
: | Who is the autoconf maintainer(s) anyways? Should it just be listed
: | as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? The line in our maintainers file is
| + grep '^#[a-z]*[ ][ ]*GIIPATHTAG[ ]*$' /tmp/ah20650.out
| + echo 'autoheader: No template for symbol `GIIPATHTAG'\'''
| autoheader: No template for symbol `GIIPATHTAG'
| + status=1
Your problem is here. autoheader, when checking if all the symbols
have a template has a pattern whi
[ On , March 23, 2000 at 17:45:21 (+0100), Akim Demaille wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Autoconf and gnu-m4 dependency
>
> Juergen> Now, what to do? Two things: Firstly, *explicit*
> Juergen> documentation of all the stuff in autoconf that depends on
> Juergen> undocumented stuff in GNU m4, and second,
