Re: Standard macro for OpenGL check?

2000-03-11 Thread Morten Eriksen
"Braden N. McDaniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Might there be any interest in having a standard macro to check for > OpenGL packaged with autoconf? There's already such a thing for X; > so I wonder, how about OpenGL? Sounds like a good idea to me, as OpenGL is getting to be a pretty common l

Re: Standard macro for OpenGL check?

2000-03-11 Thread Matthew D. Langston
The macro MDL_HAVE_OPENGL is what you want. It is in the Autoconf Macro Archive at http://peti.cys.de/autoconf-archive/ in the file mdl_have_opengl.m4. It should do everything you want. If it doesn't, please let me know (or better yet, send me a patch) as I am the original author if it. FYI, I

Re: Standard macro for OpenGL check?

2000-03-11 Thread Braden N. McDaniel
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Matthew D. Langston wrote: > The macro MDL_HAVE_OPENGL is what you want. It is in the Autoconf Macro > Archive at http://peti.cys.de/autoconf-archive/ in the file > mdl_have_opengl.m4. It should do everything you want. If it doesn't, > please let me know (or better yet, se

Re: Standard macro for OpenGL check?

2000-03-11 Thread Matthew D. Langston
Hi Braden, "Braden N. McDaniel" wrote: > > Suppose I've got a library and I want to install an autoconf macro on > the user's system so that if the user is developing a library > dependent on mine, s/he can use this macro to check for the presence > of my library. My library depends on OpenGL, s

Re: Standard macro for OpenGL check?

2000-03-11 Thread Braden N. McDaniel
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Matthew D. Langston wrote: > Hi Braden, > > "Braden N. McDaniel" wrote: > > > > Suppose I've got a library and I want to install an autoconf macro on > > the user's system so that if the user is developing a library > > dependent on mine, s/he can use this macro to check fo